Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail refused
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application stands rejected
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 120(B), 406, 419, 420, 468
Judgment
Operative part
Heard Mr. S Parashar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. BS Sin ha, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. This is the second application under section 438 of the Cr.P.C. which has been f iled by accused petitioner namely, Nazrual @ Nazrul Islam seeking pre-arrest bai l apprehending his arrest in connection with Tamarhat Police Station Case No. 9 4 of 2010 under sections 120(B) / 406/ 468/ 419/ 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code . I do not find any new ground to grant anticipatory bail. The earlier bail prayer was rejected on 09.02.2011 in AB No. 248 of 2011 after perusal of the case diar y. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application stands rejected.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application stands rejected
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 120(B), 406, 419, 420, 468.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.