THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM & Anr. v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 02 Mar 2023
- Bench
- KALYAN RAI SURANA
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 313, 376
Judgment
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./548/2023 SAIDUL ISLAM AND ANR S/O ALI SHEIKH R/O SIDHAKHOWA P.S. ROWTA DIST. UDALGURI, ASSAM 2: ABDUL RAHMAN S/O ALI SHEIKH R/O SIDHAKHOWA P.S. ROWTA DIST. UDALGURI ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A PARAMANIK Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA Date : 02.03.2023 ORDER Heard Ms. P. Kalita, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. A. Page No.# 2/2 Paramanik, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Bhaskar Sarma, learned has submitted that charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner in connection with Rowta P.S. Case No. 127/2022 under section 376/313/34 IPC vide charge-sheet no. 16/2023 dated
28.02.2023. Accordingly, the Court is inclined to close this application by giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional/ committal Court and apply for bail. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 313, 376.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Gauhati High Court, on 02 Mar 2023. The bench was KALYAN RAI SURANA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.