THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The petition stands disposed of accordingly
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 s. 379
- Assam Cattle Preservation (Amendment) Act, 2021 ss. 13(1), 16
Judgment
Operative part
BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI Date : 28.05.2024 ORDER Heard Md. B. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. This is an application made under Section 438 Cr.P.C., seeking Page No.# 2/3 pre-arrest bail by the petitioner, namely, Rejiya Khatun, apprehending arrest in connection with Basistha P.S. Case No. 665/2023, registered under Section 379 IPC r/w Section 11/(1) (D) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 r/s Section 13(1)/16 of Assam Cattle Preservation (Amendment) Act, 2021. Mr. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has appeared before the Investigating Police Officer as per direction of this Court and his statement has already been recorded after he was granted interim protection. He has not misused the liberty granted to him; rather, he co-operates with the investigation of the case. Therefore, the privilege of pre-arrest bail granted to the petitioner may be made absolute. Mr. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State submits that the petitioner may appear before the investigating officer as and when called for. It is also submitted that the statement of petitioner has already been recorded by the investigating officer. I have considered the submission made by the learned counsel for the parties and also perused the case diary. It appears that the petitioner has not misused the liberty granted to him while availing interim protection. It is directed to the petitioner to appear before the investigating officer as and when called for. Considering all, this Court is of the view that the petitioner deserves to be granted the privilege of pre-arrest bail. Accordingly, the interim protection granted to the petitioner vide order dated 16.02.2024, is made absolute on the same terms and Page No.# 3/3 conditions, as reflected. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. Return the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The petition stands disposed of accordingly
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 379; Assam Cattle Preservation (Amendment) Act, 2021 — ss. 13(1), 16.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Gauhati High Court, on 28 May 2024. The bench was MALASRI NANDI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.