Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Bails application stands disposed of
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 147, 148, 149, 302
Judgment
Operative part
All the aforesaid applications are being disposed of by this common order since the applications are arising out of same case. Heard Mr. N Rajkhowa, learned counsel for the accused petitioners. Also heard Mr . B S Sinha, ld. Addl.P.P. for the State. Also perused the case diary. All the aforesaid applications have been filed under section 438 of the Cr.P.C. which is being filed by the accused petitioners namely Taharuddin Ali, Mahajan A li, Idrish Ali, Badshah Mia, Habibus Rahman and Naushad Ali respectively praying for anticipatory bail apprehending their arrests in connection with Boko Police Station Case No.49 of 2010 under section 147/148/149/302 of the IPC. The alleged occurrence took place on 21.08.2010 and the FIR was lodged on 01.02. 2010. Besides this, the I.O. has not apprehended the present petitioners during last one year of investigation . At the same time, no witnesses has so far impli cated the present petitioners in the assault upon the deceased. Having regard to all the aspects, the prayer for bails are accepted. Accordingly the I.O. is directed to release the accused petitioners named above in the event of their arrest on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 15,000/-each with o ne local surety of like amount to his satisfaction. The petitioners are directed to appear before the I.o. within one week from toda y and they shall co-operate in the investigation of the case. Bails application stands disposed of.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Bails application stands disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 147, 148, 149, 302.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.