Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 323, 376, 457, 511
Judgment
Perused the case diary and the materials on records. On careful perusal of the case diary and materials on record and also co nsidering the fact that the petitioner is named in the FIR, I am of the consider ed view that there are sufficient incriminating materials warranting custodial i nterrogation of the petitioner in connection with the case aforementioned. In view of the above the prayer for pre-arrest bail, filed on behalf of the peti tioner, stands rejected, at this stage.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Gauhati High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. BOKO P.S. CASE No. 350 of 2010).
← Search more judgments