THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM v. ARAB UDDIN AND 10 ORS
Judgment
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/122/2022 TAIMUN NESSA LASKAR W/O- LT. JAMAL UDDIN LASKAR VILL- SARBANANDAPUR P.O. AND P.S. LALA DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM VERSUS ARAB UDDIN AND 10 ORS S/O LATE JAMAL UDDIN LASKAR VILL. NISHINATAPUR PART II P.O. MONACHERRA P.S. AND DIST. HAILAKANDI 2:AYESHA BEGUM S/O LATE JAMAL UDDIN LASKAR VILL. NISHINATAPUR PART-II P.O. MONACHERRA P.S. AND DIST. HAILAKANDI 3:SABJA BEGUM D/O LATE JAMAL UDDIN LASKAR VILL. NISHHINATAPUR PART-II P.O. MONACHERRA P.S. AND DIST. HAILAKANDI 4:KUTIFUL BIBI D/O UNKNOWN VILL. NISHINATAPUR PART-II P.O. MONACHERRA P.S. AND DIST. HAILAKANDI Page No.# 2/3 5:NAJMUL ISLAM LASKAR S/O LATE JAMAL UDDIN LASKAR VILL. AND P.O. SARBANANDAPUR P.S. LALA DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM. 6:RIAZUL AMIN LASKAR S/O LATE JAMAL UDDIN LASKAR VILL.AND P.O. SARBANANDAPUR P.S. LALA DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM. 7:THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM WATER RESOURCE DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI 6 8:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM PENSION AND PUBLIC GRIEVANCES DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI 6 9:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL OF ASSAM( A AND E) MAIDAMGAON BELTOLA GUWAHATI 28 10:THE CHIEF ENGINEER WATER RESOURCE DEPTT. CHANDMARI GUWAHATI 3 11:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WATER RESOURCE DEPTT. HAILAKANDI DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM. ------------ Advocate for : MR. A M BARBHUIYA Advocate for : SC WATER RESOURCE appearing for ARAB UDDIN AND 10 ORS Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. SEMA Date : 26-04-2022 ORDER Heard Mr. A.M Barbhuiya, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Mr. P. Kalita, learned Standing counsel for the Water Resource department and Ms. A. Talukdar, learned Government Advocate for the Pension department. This is an application for impleadment of the opposite party No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6 as party respondents in W.P.(C) No. 4726/2021 in terms of the order dated 10.12.2021 passed by this Court in the said writ petition. The learned counsels representing the Water Resource department and the Pension department has no objection to the said impleadment. The opposite party No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6 in the present I.A are impleaded as respondents in the W.P.(C) No. 4726/2021 I.A (C) stands disposed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.