✦ High Court of India · 01 Sep 2025

Mr. Vinit Trehan, Ms. Bhumi Agarwal Mr. Sushant Pal, Advs v. C.N.A. EXPORTS PVT. LTD. AND ORS

Case Details High Court of India · 01 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
01 Sep 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,789 words

$~1 to 5, A1 to A5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1113/2007 JANAK DATWANI .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Vinit Trehan, Ms. Bhumi Agarwal & Mr. Sushant Pal, Advs. Versus C.N.A. EXPORTS PVT. LTD. AND ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Anand Datwani, AR/Managing Director of D-1 in person. Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Adv. with D-2/Mr. Anand Datwani in person. Mr. Mohammad Nausheen Samar & Ms. Khushboo Thakur, Advs. for D-4/Kishore Datwani. Mr. Vivek Sharma, Ms. Mamta Gautam & Mr. Aditya Jain, Advs. for D-6/Kishin Datwani. Mr. Snehil Srivastava, Adv. for D-7/Nitya Datwani. 2 + CS(OS) 556/2008 SMT.JAMNA DATWANI AND ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Anand Datwani/Managing Director of P-2 in person. Versus SH. ANAND DATWANI AND ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Adv. with D-1/Mr. Anand Datwani in person. Mr. Vivek Sharma, Ms. Mamta Gautam & Mr. Aditya Jain, Advs. for Kishin Datwani. 3 + CS(OS) 1798/2011 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/09/2025 at 11:54:25 JANAK DATWANI .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Vinit Trehan, Ms. Bhumi Agarwal & Mr. Sushant Pal, Advs. Versus PACIFICA (INDIA) PROJECTS PVT. LTD & ORS .....Defendants Through: Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Adv. with D-3/Mr. Anand Datwani in person. Mr. Vivek Sharma, Ms. Mamta Gautam & Mr. Aditya Jain, Advs. for Kishin Datwani. 4 + CS(OS) 244/2013 JANAK DATWANI .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Vinit Trehan, Ms. Bhumi Agarwal & Mr. Sushant Pal, Advs. Versus C.N.A EXPORTS PVT LTD & ORS .....Defendants Through: Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Adv. with D-2/Mr. Anand Datwani in person Mr. Vivek Sharma, Ms. Mamta Gautam & Mr. Aditya Jain, Advs. for Kishin Datwani 5 + CS(OS) 155/2021 JANAK DATWANI .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Vinit Trehan, Ms. Bhumi Agarwal & Mr. Sushant Pal, Advs. Versus KISHIN DATWANI .....Defendant Through: Mr. Vivek Sharma, Ms. Mamta Gautam & Mr. Aditya Jain, Advs. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/09/2025 at 11:54:25 A1 + CM(M) 867/2018 SUSHMA RAVIDAS ..... Petitioner Through: Versus JANAK DATWANI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vinit Trehan, Ms. Bhumi Agarwal & Mr. Sushant Pal, Advs. A2 + CM(M) 1376/2018 JANAK DATWANI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vinit Trehan, Ms. Bhumi Agarwal & Mr. Sushant Pal, Advs. Versus JAMNA DATWANI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Adv. for Mr. Anand Datwani with Mr. Anand Datwani in person Mr. Vivek Sharma, Ms. Mamta Gautam & Mr. Aditya Jain, Advs. for respondent/Mr. Kishan Datwani A3 + CONT.CAS(C) 66/2020 M/S CAN EXPORTS (P) LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Versus MANSI SHARMA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Adv. for respondent/Mr. Anand Datwani with Mr. Anand Datwani in person Mr. Vivek Sharma, Ms. Mamta Gautam & Mr. Aditya Jain, Advs. for respondent/Mr. Kishin Datwani This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/09/2025 at 11:54:25 A4 + FAO 141/2018 SUSHMA RAVIDAS ..... Petitioner Through: Versus M/S PACIFICA INFASTRUCTURE PVT LTD & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Adv. for respondent/Mr. Anand Datwani with Mr. Anand Datwani in person Mr. Vivek Sharma, Ms. Mamta Gautam & Mr. Aditya Jain, Advs. for respondent/Mr. Kishin Datwani A5 + FAO 142/2018 JANAK DATWANI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vinit Trehan, Ms. Bhumi Agarwal & Mr. Sushant Pal, Advs. Versus PACIFICA INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Adv. for respondent/Mr. Anand Datwani with Mr. Anand Datwani in person Mr. Vivek Sharma, Ms. Mamta Gautam & Mr. Aditya Jain, Advs. for respondent/Mr. Kishan Datwani CORAM: JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL) MS. PREETI PAREWA, (DHJS) % 01.09.2025 O R D E R IA No.21429/2025 moved by defendant no.4/Mr. Kishore Datwani seeking condonation of delay in filing reply to IA no.16363/2025. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/09/2025 at 11:54:25

1. Learned counsel for the defendant no.2 accepts notice of the captioned IA and submits that he has no objection to the captioned IA subject to imposition of suitable cost. 2. Re-notify the captioned IA on the next date of hearing. IA No.16758/2025 under Order XVI Rule 1(2) CPC moved by the plaintiff for summoning of witness and directions; and 3. As per office note, replies to the captioned IAs filed by defendant no.2 are on record. However, rejoinder to the same has not been filed by the applicant/plaintiff till date. IA No.16665/2025 under Order XVI Rule 1(3) CPC moved by the plaintiff seeking permission to bring Additional witness 4. The defendant no.6/Kishin Datwani, defendant no.4/Kishore Datwani & defendant no.7/Nitya Datwani have already given their no objection to the above-captioned IA. 5. At this stage, learned counsel for the plaintiff seeks adjournment on the ground of a medical exigency in his family. Not opposed. In the interest of justice, the matter stands adjourned today. 6. Re-notify the captioned IA for filing of rejoinder, if any, to the reply of defendant no.2 on the next date of hearing. 7. Reply to the captioned IA filed by defendant no.4 has been placed by the Registry. However, an application bearing IA no.21429/2025 moved by defendant no.4 seeking condonation of delay in filing reply to the IA No.16363/2025 under Section 151 CPC moved by the defendant no.2 for striking of Evidence Affidavit filed by defendant no.4 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/09/2025 at 11:54:25 captioned IA has been filed freshly. 8. Further, rejoinder to the reply of defendant no.4 filed by the applicant/defendant no.2 is lying under objections. 9. Further, as per office note, reply to the captioned IA filed by plaintiff is also on record but rejoinder to the same has not been filed by the applicant/defendant no.2 till date. 10. No reply to the captioned IA filed by defendant no.7/Ms. Nitya Datwani till date. 11. Mr. Anand Datwani AR of defendant no.1 already submitted that he shall not be filing any reply to the captioned IA. 12. It is pointed out by the parties that the defendant no.5 has expired. 13. As per office note, steps have not been taken by the applicant for service of defendant no.3 with notice of the captioned IA as PF has not been filed. 14. Re-notify the captioned IA for completion of pleadings/service on the next date of hearing. 15. At request, re-notify the matter on the next date of hearing. I.A. 12843/2025 (under Section 151 of CPC, 1908, by defendant No.2) 16. As per office note, fresh Vakalatnama filed on behalf of the plaintiff is on record. CS(OS)1113/2007 17. Further, documents filed on behalf of defendant no.2&4 are on record. 18. At this stage, learned counsel for the plaintiff seeks adjournment on the ground of a medical exigency in his family. Not opposed. In the interest of justice, the matter stands adjourned today. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/09/2025 at 11:54:25

19. Re-notify the matter for further proceedings on the next date of hearing. CS(OS) 556/2008 & 20. Pleadings qua defendant no.1 are already complete. IA No.12276/2025 under Order XXII Rule 1,3&5 r/w Order I Rule 10 r/w Section 151 CPC moved by defendant no.2 for substitution of defendant no.2 to 4 as LR of deceased plaintiff no.1 & for transposition of plaintiff no.2 as defendant no.2 and for deletion of defendant no.2 to 4 from the array of defendants in the suit. 21. As per office note, reply to the captioned IA filed by the plaintiff no.2 is on record. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant/defendant no.2 submits that he does not wish to file any rejoinder to the same. Thus, pleadings qua plaintiff no.2 are complete. 22. The defendant no.3/Janak Datwani and defendant no.4/Ms. Nitya Datwani have already submitted that they do not wish to file any reply to the captioned IA as they have no objection to the same. 23. Re-notify the captioned IA for further proceedings on the next date of hearing. 24. Pleadings are already complete. IA No.5034/2025 under Order XXII Rule 5 CPC moved by defendant no.1/Anand Datwani seeking directions 25. Re-notify the captioned IA for arguments on the next date of hearing. 26. No reply to the captioned IA has been filed by defendant no.9 in IA no.2377/2024 namely Mr. C. S. Batra till date. None is present on behalf of D-9 today to explain IA No.8473/2025 moved by defendant no.3/Mr. Janak Datwani seeking condonation of delay in filing reply to IA no.2377/2024 by defendant no.3/Mr. C.S. Batra This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/09/2025 at 11:54:25 in this regard. 27. Re-notify the captioned IA for completion of pleadings on the next date of hearing. 28. An application seeking condonation of delay in filing reply to captioned IA filed by defendant no.3 is pending consideration. IA no.2377/2024 under Order IX Rule 8 r/w Section 151 CPC moved by the defendant no.9 for dismissal of the suit 29. It is already stated by AR of plaintiff no.2 that he does not wish to file any reply to the captioned IA. 30. No reply to the captioned IA has been filed by plaintiff no.1 till date. In the meantime, plaintiff no.1 has expired. 31. An application bearing IA no.5034/2025 filed by defendant no.1 pursuant to death of plaintiff no.1 is also pending consideration. 32. List the matter alongwith CS(OS) 1113/2007 on the next date of hearing. 33. List the matter alongwith CS(OS) 1113/2007 on 03.09.2025. CS(OS) 1798/2011, CS(OS) 244/2013, CS(OS) 155/2021, CM(M) 867/2018 , CM(M) 1376/2018, CONT.CAS(C) 66/2020, FAO 141/2018 and FAO 142/2018 PREETI PAREWA (DHJS) JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL) SEPTEMBER 1, 2025/ab

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments