✦ Delhi High Court

Advocates v. Prahladpur

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

the Petition is disposed of along with the pending

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. Accordingly, the Petition is disposed of along with the pending Application(s). FEBRUARY 4, 2025/va NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown…

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 6121/2018, CRL.M.A. 48706/2018 SUSHIL KUMAR VERMA Through: Ms. Sanjib Dutta and Mr. C. Saha, Advocates. .....Petitioner versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, Ld. APP for the State with SI Deepak Sahu, P.S. Pul Prahladpur. .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R 04.02.2025 A Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C has been filed for quashing of FIR No.396/2015 under Section 288/304A IPC.

2.

The facts in brief are that the deceased Bablu while painting the house of Sushil Kumar got electrocuted and died. A complaint was made by Shri Sohan Pal @ Sonu, the Contractor made a Complaint and FIR under Section 304A was registered.

3.

Though, the parties have settled the matter in the Mediation Centre, whereby the Petitioner has paid ₹40,000/- to Respondent No.2 wife of Late Balwant Singh Tomar @ Bablu on 27.08.2018 before the Court of learned M.M and also the Petition is supported with the Affidavit of Respondent No.2, but considering the nature of Settlement and that the LRs of deceased This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/02/2025 at 14:55:27 are not appearing, the Petition for quashing of FIR is dismissed.

Operative part

4.

Accordingly, the Petition is disposed of along with the pending Application(s). FEBRUARY 4, 2025/va NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/02/2025 at 14:55:27

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: the Petition is disposed of along with the pending

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 288, 304A.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Delhi High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments