PALLAVIJHA v. GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY AND ORS

Advocate for respondents No'1 and 2 Mr.Amit Bansal and Ms.Ritika Nagpal, Advocate for resPondent no.3 + t3l W.P.(c) 7s6s/2o1-2 & cM.Le227/2o1'2 RICKKY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr'Dinesh Chander Yadav and M r.A.S.Singh, Advocates i ? versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA uNrvERrs* 1hor33rn, Mr Ravi ii*;'i";'fil}:ffLnuu Karra, " Advocate for respondents No'l and 2 Mr.Amit Bansal and Ms.Ritika Nagpal, Advocate for resPondent no.3 + [6] w.P.(c) 7616/20L2 JASMINE SOOD .'..' Petitioner hrough: Mr.Dine_sh Chander Yadav and Mr.A.S.5ingh, Advocates VCTSUS GUIlU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY AND ORS '.'.. Respondent Through: Mr.Ravi Sikri and Mr.Vaibhav Kalra, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2 Mr.Amit Bansal and Ms.Ritika Nagpal, Advocate for resPondent no.3 Signature Not Verified Signing Date:25.09.2024 17:03:17 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. 4-1 + [8] W.P.(C) 7621-/20L2 ANLJPAMA Through: Mr.Dinesh Chander Yadav and Mr.A.S.Singh, Advocates ""' Petitioner VCTSUS GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY AND ORS .."' Respondent Throuqh: Mr.Ravi Sikri and Mr.Vaibhav Kalra, " t Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2 Mr.Amit Bansal and Ms.Ritika Nagpal, Advocate for resPondent no.3 V i + [,e] w.P.(c) 7628/2072 AGAM GUPTA Through: Mr.Dinesh Chander Yadav and M r.A.S.Si ngh, Advocates ."" Petitioner versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA LJNIVERSITY AND ORS ....' Respondent Through: Mr.Ravi Sikri and Mr.Vaibhav Kalra, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2 Mr.Amit Bansal and Ms.Ritika Nagpal, Advocate for resPondent no.3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI Vo ORDER L8.L2.2OL2 In the present cases, petitioners were granted provisional admission in different courses by respondent, colleges for the academic year 2OI2- )* rD t-J. Ine students were directed to complete all the formalities including furnishing result of the graduation by 31.10.2012. As the result was not declared by the Delhi University, the present petitioners have filed the writ petitions. This court has allowed connected writ petitions filed by the students, primarity on the ground that the students cannot be made to suffer on account of inaction on the part of the Delhi University in not declaring the result on time. w.P.(c) 7685, 7564-65, 7616, 762r,7628/20L2 J Counsel for the respondents No.1 and 2 has produced the results of the petitioners herein in court today, which has been handed over to Mr.Sikri, counsel for respondent, University. According to the result all the petitioners herein have secured more than sOVo marks and thus meet the eligibility criteria. Since the result of the petitioners herein have been declared and they have secured more than 5OV" marks, the delay in submitting the result stands condoned. t Interim orders are made absolute. Accordingly, writ petitions and the applications stand disposed of. DASTI io .ornrel for the parties under , the signatures of the Court Master. DECEMBER L8,2OL2 w.p.(c) 7685, 7564-65, 7676, 7627,7628/2072 E-s--<J:* 1'- G.S.S|STAMrl- lF *ii -1' t' . i* $-6s-78 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELI.II AT T{EW DELHI + w.P,(c) 7564/20L2 NEl"lA BHARDWAJ Through: Mr.Keane Sardinha, Adv. for Mr.Dinesh Chander Yadav, Advocates ..... Petitioner VETSUS GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERISTY & ORS Through: Mr.Mukul Talwar, Adv. for GGSIPU Ms.Ritika Nagpal for Mr.Amit Bansal, Advocate for respondent University of Delhi. ..... ResPondent + w.P.(c) 7s6s/2oL2 RICKKY Through: Mr.Keane Sardinha, Adv. for Mr.Dinesh Chander Yadav, Advocates ..... Petitioner VETSUS GURU GOI3IND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA LJNIVERISTY & ORS Through: Mr.Mukul Talwar, Adv. for GGSIPU Ms.Ritika Nagpal tor Mr.Amit Bansal, Advocate for respondent University of Delhi. ..... Respondent + w.P.(c) 7s67/2A12 JUBY TREESA CHANDRAN Through: Mr.Keane Sardinha, Adv. for Mr.Dinesh Chander Yadav, Advocates ..... Petitioner b, - ? versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERISTY & ORS Through: Mr.Mukul Talwar, Adv. for GGSIPU ..... ResPondent X;"i:5X}#i"1';T#:filllfJlii';, De,hi + w.P.(c) 761"4/2012 BHANUPRIYA RAWAT 'l-hrough: Mr.Keane Sardinha, Adv. for Mr.Dinesh Chander Yadav, Advocates ..... Petitioner VCTSUS GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERISTY & ORS Through: Mr.Mukul Talwar, Adv. for GGSIPU ..... ResPondent Ms.Ritika Nagpal for Mr.Amit Bansal, Advocate for respondent University of Delhi. : + w.P.(c) 76L6/20L2 JASMINE SOOD Through: Mr.Keane Sardinha, Adv. for Mr.Dinesh Chander Yadav, Advocates ..... Petitioner VCTSUS GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY AND ORS Through: Mr.Mukul Talwar, Adv. for GGSIPU Ms.Ritika Nagpal for Mr.Amit Bansal, Advocate for respondent University of Delhi. ..... Respondent + w.P.(c) 7618/2012 BHARTI RAWAT Through: Mr.Keane Sardinha, Adv. for Mr.Dinesh Chander Yadav, Advocates ..... Petitioner VCTSUS GURU GOBIND SINGI.I INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY AND oRS Through: Mr.Mukul Talwar, Adv. for GGSIPU Ms.Ritika Nagpal for Mr.Amit Bansal, Advocate for respondent University of Delhi. ..... Respondent .: . ',",' + w.P.(c) 7619/2012 NISHA Through: Mr.Keane Sardinha, Adv. for Mr.Dinesh Chander Yadav, Advocates ..... Petitioner VETSUS GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY AND ORS Through: Mr.Mukul Talwar, Adv. for GGSIPU Ms.Ritika Nagpal for Mr.Amit Bansal, Advocate for respondent University of Delhi. ..... Respondent + w.P.(c) 7620/20L2 RISHABH AGGARWAL Through: Mr.Keane Sardinha, Adv. for Mr.Dinesh Chander Yadav, Advocates ..... PCtitiONCT - versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSIry AND ORS Through: Mr.Mukul Talwar, Adv. for GGSIPU Ms.Ritika Nagpal for Mr.Amit Bansal, Advocate for respondent University of Delhi. .'... Respondent + w.P.(c) 7621/20L2 ANUPAMA Through: Mr.Keane Sardinha, Adv. for Mr.Dinesh Chander Yadav, Advocates .... Petitioner w.p.(c) 7564/20L2, 7565/20L2, 7567/2072, 76L4/2072, 7616/2072, 76L8/2072, 7679/20L2, 7620/20L2, 762L/20L2, 7628/20L2, 7629/20L2, 7685/2012, 7729/20L2 & 7731-/201"2 '-,\ tr" ? , versuS GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY AND ORS Through: Mr.Mukul Talwar, Adv. for GGSIPU Ms.Ritika Nagpal for Mr.Amit Bansal, Advocate for respondent University of Delhi. ..... RCSPONdCNT + w.P.(c) 7628/2012 AGAM GUPTA Through: Mr.Keane Sardinha, Adv. for Mr.Dinesh Chander Yadav, Advocates ..... Petitioner VETSUS GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITy AND ORS Through: Mr.Mukul Talwar, Adv. for GGSIPU Ms'Ritika Nagpal for Mr'Amit Bansal, Advocate for respondent University of Delhi. ..... Respondent + w.P.(c) 7629/2012 NEEYATI SETHI " Throuqh: Mr.Keane Sardinha, Adv. for Mr.Dinesh Chander Yadav, Advocates ..... Petitioner VETSUS GURU GOBIND SINGFI INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSIry AND ORS Through: Mr.Mukul Talwar, Adv. for GGSIPU Ms.Ritika Nagpal for Mr.Amit Bansal, Advocate for respondent University of Delhi. ..... tlespondent PALLAVI jHA Through: Mr.Keane Sardinha, Adv. for Mr.Dinesh Chander Yadav, Advocates ..... Petitioner VerSuS GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY AND ORS Through: Mr.Mukul Talwar, Adv. for GGSIPtJ Ms.Ritika Nagpal for Mr.Amit Bansal, Advocate for respondent University of Delhi' ..... Respondent + w,P.(C) 7729/20L2 SONIA SHANKYA Through: Mr.Keane Sardinha, Adv. for Mr.Dinesh Chander Yadav, Advocates ..... Petitioner VETSUS w.p.(c) 7564/20L2, 7565/2072, 7567/2072, 7614/20L2, 7676/20L2, 761-8/20L2, 76L9/20L2, 7620/20L2, 7621./20L2, 7628/201"2, 7629/20L2, 7685/20L2, 7729/201"2 & 773L/2072 3/s GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY AND ORS Through: Mr.Mukul Talwar, Adv. for GGSIPU Ms.Ritika Nagpal for Mr.Amit Bansal, Advocate for respondent University of Delhi. ..... Respondent + w,P.(c) 773L/201-2 MS. KALPANA Through: Mr.Keane Sardinha, Adv. for Mr.Dinesh Chander Yadav, Advocates ..... Petitioner .J Vr D v VCTSUS GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY AND ORS Through: Mr.Mukul Talwar, Adv. for GGSIPU Ms.Ritika Nagpal for Mr.Amit Bansal, Aclvocate for respondent University of Delhi. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI ORDER 04.03.20L3 Y" CM APPL. 274L|2OL3 tN W.P.(C) 7567l2OL2 (L3 davs delav) cM AppL. 274212013 tN W.p.(Cl 7614/2Ot_2 (I_L davs delavl CM APPL. 2745l2OL3 lN W.P.(C) 76L8/2OL2 (LL davs delav) Clvl nppl. Zza+/ZOrE lru W.p.(Ct ZerglZOrZ (rr davs 4e!av) Cnn nppl. Zz+g/ZOrg tru W.p.(Ct ZOZO|ZOLZ (rr Oavs Oelav) CM APPL. 273912OL3 lN W.P.(CI 762912OL2 (1L davs delavl CM APPL. 273812OL3 lN W.P.(C) 7729l2OL2 (11 davs delav) CM APFL. 274Ol2O13 lN W.P.(C) 773L12O12 (O6 davs delavl

1. By the present applications, the applicant/GGSIPU seeks condonation of delay in filing the review petitions.

2. Notice. Learned counsel for the petitioner and University of Delhi, non-applicants, accept notice and have no objection if the present applications are allowed.

3. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the application and in view of the stand taken by counsel for the non-applicants, present applications are allowed. Delay in filing the review petitions stands condoned.

4. Applications stand disposed of. w.p.(c) 7564/20L2, 7565/20L2, 7567/2012, 76L4/201.2, 76L6/2072' 7678/2072, 7679/2072, 7620/2072, 7627/20L2, 7628/20L2, 7629/20L2, 768s/2072, 7729/20L2 & 773L/201-2 4/s tD . 'r $ R,EVTEW PET. r.33/20L3 lN W.P.(C) 7s64l20r-2 REVIEW PET. L34l20r.3 lN W.P.(C) 7s6sl2012 REVTEW PET. 12412013 lN W.P.(Cl 75671201 2 REVTEW PET. L271201,3 lt{ W.P.(Cl 76r.4/20L2 REVTEW PET. L28/2013 lN W.P.(C) 76r.6/20r.2 REVTEW PET. L32I2OL3 lN W.P.(C) 7618/2012 REVfEWPET. L3L|2OL3 l@ REVTEW PET. L29l2013 lN W.P.(C) 7620l20L2 REVIEW PET. L2sl2013 lN W.P.(Cl 762Ll2012 REVTEW PET. I"30/20L3 lN W.P.(Cl 7628120I-2 REVTEW pET. r,22l2or.3 !N W.P.(C) 76291201-2 REVTEW PET. r.26120L3 lN W.P.(C) 768sl20l2 REVTEW PET. L2Ll2013 lN W.P.(C) 7729l20L2 REVTEW PET. 123/20L3 lN W.P.(C) 773L120r.2 \'r.- ). eiy the present review petitions, the review petitioneriGGSlPU seeks review of the Orders dated 72.72.2072 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 772912072, 773l^120l-2; 78.72.2072 passed in W.P.(C) 7 685/2012, 7 56412012, 7 565120l2, 7 6l-612012, 7 62L120r2, 7628120l-2; 7.72.2072 passed in W.P.(C) 762912012, 76L4/2OI2, 16LB|20I2 to 762012012; and 77.72.2072 passed in W.P.(C) 7 567 120]-2.

6. Mr.Talwar submits that the order dated I2.L2.20I2, 18.12.2412, 1.l2.2OI2 and 1-L.a2.201-2 may be clarified to the extent that all the legal pleas of the respondent/Gcs|PU may be kept open to be decided in appropriate proceedings if the need so arises in future. 7. Notice. Learned counsel for the non-applicants accept notice and have no objection if the present review petitions are allowed. B. Accordingly, review petitions are allowed. lt is clarified that the questions with regard to the fixing of cut off date and its relevance are left open to enable the respondent/GcslPU to address thele-. issues in appropriate proceedings should the need so arise.

9. Review petition stands disposed of. J_ -.-- G.s.srsrANr, j- -€-<'SzJ* MARCI-I 04, 2OL3 msr w.p. (c) 7 564/201,2, 7 565/201-2, 7 567/2072, 76L4/2072, 76L6/201"2, 76L8/2072, 7619/2072, 7620/20L2, 7627/20L2, 7628/20L2, 7629/201-2, 7685/2072, 7729/201,2 & 773L/201-2 s/s