SAMBHAVANAs v. DELHI UNIVERSITY & Ors.
Judgment
Ms. Jubli Momali, Advocate. versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Saurabh Banerjee with Mr. Bikram Singh, Advocates for respondent N.1. Ms. Beenashaw N. Soni with Mr. Aakash Yadav, Advocates for respondent Nos.3, 11, 22 and 30. Ms. Ritu Kumari with Ms. Deepshikha Goyal, Ms. Urvashi, Ms. Rimjim and Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, Advocates for respondent Nos.9, 14 and 50. Mr. Amit Bansal with Ms. Seema Dolo, Advocates for respondent No.13. Mr. Anurag Mathur, Advocate for respondent Nos.15 and 84. Mr. S. S. Ahluwalia with Mr. Jatin Teotia, Advocates for respondent Nos.19, 25, 43, 44, 61, 63, 64, 75 and 76 Mr. M.K. Singh, Advocates for respondent Nos.23 and 81. Mr. Samar Bansal, Advocate for respondent No.85. Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Shahi and Mr. Harsh Pandit, Advocates for UOI. W.P.(C) 16258/2006 & WP(C) 8879/2008 + CM Nos.9765/2016 & 9764/2016 In W.P.(C) 8879/2008 ASSOCIATION FOR THE RIGHTS OF DISABLE PERSONS Through: Mr. Samar Bansal, Advocate. ..... Petitioner versus DELHI UNIVERSITY Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Saurabh Banerjee with Mr. Bikram Singh, Advocates for respondent N.1. Mr. Amitesh Kumar with Ms. Binisa Mohanty, Advocates for NUEPA. Ms. Anushka Ashok with Ms. Bhawna Pal, Advocates for JNU. Mr. R.K. Singh, Advocate for SPA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA % O R D E R 07.12.2017 At the request of learned counsel for the parties, renotify on
21.03.2018. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J DECEMBER 07, 2017 W.P.(C) 16258/2006 & WP(C) 8879/2008
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.