Judgment · High Court

$3, 36 and 43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF 1)ELHI AT NEW 1)ELHI (cid:9) + CONT.CAS(C) 645/2012 (cid:9) . MAHAVIR SINGH(cid:9) Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit K. Khatri, Advocate versus DEVESH SINGH (cid:9) Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Birbal, Advocate for the respondent/i)DA (cid:9) CONT.CAS(C) 649/2012 ± MADAN LAL (cid:9) Petitioner Through: Mr. Surnit K. Khatri, Advocate versus DEVESH SINGH (cid:9) Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Birbal, Advocate for the respondent/Di)A (cid:9) CONT.CAS(C) 651/2012 ± S RAM AVTAR Petitioner Through: Mr. Surnit K. Khatri, Advocate versus DEVESH SINGH (cid:9) Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Birbal, Advocate for the respondent/1)DA WP(C) 645/2012. WP(C) 649/2012 & WP(C) 651/2012(cid:9) Page 1 oI3 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AMULYA -- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER (y0(cid:9) ORDER

28.09.2012 CM No.17060/20 12 in WP (C) 645/2012 CM No.17118/2012 in WP (C) 649/2012 CM No.17125/2012 in WP (C) 651/2012 Allowed subject to just exceptions. WP(C) 645/2012, WP(C) 649/2012 & WP(C) 651/2012 Issue notice to the respondents. Mr. Birbal accepts notice Ofl behalf of the respondents. With the consent of the parties, the petitions are taken up for final disposal. In the captioned petitions, the only grievance of the petitioners is that their representation are not being disposed of as directed by this court vide order dated 27.04.2012 passed in WP (C) 2466/2012. Learned counsel for the parties also inform me that an identical issue which is subject matter of the representations filed by the petitioners before me is, pending • adjudication in WP (C) 4026/20 1 1 before FIon'ble Mr .Justice Sunil Gaur. Mr. Birbal submits that the said writ petitions are coming up for hearing before I-Ion'b!e Mr. Justice Sunil Gaur on 03.10.2012. He further submits that the respondents shall abide by the decision in WP (C) 4026/2011. The said decision shall also apply to the pending representations made by the petitioners before me. (cid:9)This statement is, however, subject to the respondents not availing of remedy of appeal in case the decision in WP (C) WP(C) 645/2012, WP(C) 649/2012 & WP(C) 651/2012(cid:9) Page 2 of3 4026/2011 is rendered against the interest of the respondents. With the aforesaid statement on record, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the captioned petitions any further. The captioned petitions are accordingly disposed of Dasti. SEPTEMBER 28, 2012 RAJIV SHAKDHER, J WP(C) 645/2012. WP(C) 649/2012 & WP(C) 651/2012(cid:9) Page 3 of3 . S