✦ Delhi High Court · 25 Sep 2009

Khadi and Village Industries Commission v. New Delhi Municipal Council

CIVIL) No. 11987 of 2009ANIL KUMAR2 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Remanded

2009 are set aside and the matter is remanded to respondent council

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. Whether the judgment should be reported in YES NO NO the Digest? ANIL KUMAR, J. (ORAL) * The grievance of the petitioner is that it is a statutory body created under the Khadi and Village Industries Commission Act, 1956. The functions of the commission…

Judgment

Through Mr.G.K.Srivastava, Advocate Versus New Delhi Municipal Council …. Respondent Through Ms.Madhu TewatiaSangeeta Chandra, CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR Advocate

1.

Whether reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? To be referred to the reporter or not?

Operative part

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in YES NO NO the Digest? ANIL KUMAR, J. (ORAL) * The grievance of the petitioner is that it is a statutory body created under the Khadi and Village Industries Commission Act, 1956. The functions of the commission are defined under Section 15 of the said Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is entitled for exemption from paying property tax under the NDMC Act, 1994, however, the exemption has been denied by a cryptic order that the petitioner does not qualify for exemption from payment of property tax by order dated 22nd July, 2009 without giving any reason. Issue show cause notice to the respondent. Ms. Madhu Tewatia accepts notice on behalf of the respondent and contends that the order W. P. (C.) No.11987/2009 be set aside and the matter be remanded back to New Delhi Municipal Council for fresh adjudication after giving reasonable opportunity to the petitioner. The learned counsel also contended that the reason as to why the petitioner is not entitled for exemption from property tax under Section 62 of NDMC Act, 1994 shall be given. In the circumstances the assessment order dated 22nd July, 2009 and the demand raised consequent thereto by letter dated 2nd February, 2009 are set aside and the matter is remanded to respondent council for fresh adjudication with the reasons as to why the petitioner shall not be entitled for exemption under Section 62 of NDMC Act, 1994 from payment of property tax. The respondents shall consider the objections and the documents and material produced by the petitioner. The petitioner shall be entitled to produce additional documents and material in support of his contentions that the petitioner commission is exempted from payment of property tax under Section 62. The petitioner shall be entitled to file objections/additional objections with supporting documents within four weeks. The petitioner shall appear before the Assessing Authority, Director (Taxes) on 10th November, 2009 at 11.00 A.M. With these directions the petition is disposed of. Parties are left to bear their own costs. Dasti. September 25, 2009 ‘Dev’ ANIL KUMAR, J. W. P. (C.) No.11987/2009

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: 2009 are set aside and the matter is remanded to respondent council

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Khadi and Village Industries Commission Act, 1956.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Delhi High Court, on 25 Sep 2009. The bench was ANIL KUMAR.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Delhi High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CIVIL) No. 11987 of 2009). ← Search more judgments