Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 O. VII r. 11
Judgment
$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 545/2025 & CM APPL. 17166-17167/2025 GEETA PAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit Srivastava with Mr. Jyotirmay Vasishtt and Mr. Pushaan Singh Gulia, Advocates. versus SMT. BADAMI DEVI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN O R D E R % 16.05.2025 1. Report has been received from learned Principal District & Sessions Judge, North East, Karkardooma Courts which also indicates that order dated 16.12.2022 was not appealable one. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner also acknowledges the abovesaid legal position. He also submits that while he does not press the present petition, he may be granted liberty to file appropriate petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to challenge order dated 16.12.2022 whereby their application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC was dismissed by the learned Trial Court. 3. The petition, in view of the aforesaid, is disposed of as not pressed. Liberty, as prayed, is granted. 4. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. MANOJ JAIN, J MAY 16, 2025/st/pb
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.