Rajesh Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Quashed
Delhi and all the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 323, 342, 506
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. Whether reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported YES NO NO in the Digest? ANIL KUMAR, J. * The petitioner and respondent No.2 are…
Judgment
Through: Mr.Swarn Kumar, Advocate along with petitioner in person. Versus State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr ......... Respondents Through : Mr.R.N. Vats, APP for State. Mr.Manjul Kumar Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2 along with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM :- * HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
Operative part
Whether reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported YES NO NO in the Digest? ANIL KUMAR, J. * The petitioner and respondent No.2 are present with their counsel. The learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent No.2 state that the matter has been resolved between the parties and pursuant to the settlement of their disputes, they want to continue having good relations. Petitioner is stated to be a meritorious student and he is stated to be not in a position to continue the proceedings. In CRLMC-2407/2008 Page 1 of 2 the circumstances, it is contended that no useful purpose shall be served in continuing the proceedings pursuant to FIR No.62/2000, under Sections 342/323/506/34 of Indian Penal Code, P.S.Maurice Nagar. Considering the facts and circumstances and the fact that the matter has been resolved amicably between the petitioner and respondent No.2 and petitioner being a student and since they have agreed to continue good relations, no useful purpose shall be served in continuing the proceedings pursuant to FIR No.62/2000 under Sections 342/323/506/34 of IPC registered at Police Station Maurice Nagar, Delhi. It shall also be in the interest of justice to quash the said FIR and all the proceedings emanating therefrom. Consequently, FIR No.62/2000 Sections 342/323/506/34 of IPC registered at Police Station Maurice Nagar, Delhi and all the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. The petition is disposed of. Dasti. August 1, 2008 ‘k’ ANIL KUMAR, J. CRLMC-2407/2008 Page 2 of 2
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Delhi and all the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 323, 342, 506.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Delhi High Court, on 01 Aug 2008. The bench was ANIL KUMAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.