Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- DISTRICT
Outcome
Withdrawn
In view of the aforesaid submissions, the present revision petition, alongwith all pending applications, is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 O. XII r. 6
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In view of the aforesaid submissions, the present revision petition, along with all pending applications, is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the…
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ C.R.P. 354/2025 & CM APPLs. 81618-19/2025 SUKHESH CHAND GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Tarun Agarwal, Advocate (VC) versus DR. SUDESH RATTAN & ORS. .....Respondents Through: None CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANO R D E R% 23.12.20251.The present revision petition is directed against the order dated 25.09.2025 passed by the learned District Judge-01, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi, whereby the application filed by the petitioner [plaintiff in Civil Suit No. 58678/2016] under Order XII Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, was dismissed.
Mr. Tarun Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that in view of certain subsequent developments, the petitioner does not wish to pursue the present revision petition, and seeks liberty to avail appropriate remedies in accordance with law. He further submits that the rate of rent of the suit property, namely, Shop bearing Nos. 38-39, Plot No. 1, 205-C, Bengali Market, has again been enhanced in accordance with law, as a consequence of which fresh notices have been issued by the petitioner.
Operative part
In view of the aforesaid submissions, the present revision petition, along with all pending applications, is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/12/2025 at 11:49:56 as aforesaid, and without prejudice to the rights and remedies available to the petitioner in accordance with law. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the maintainability or merits of any such remedies. PRATEEK JALAN, JDECEMBER 23, 2025dy/SD/
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the aforesaid submissions, the present revision petition, alongwith all pending applications, is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. XII r. 6.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.