Judgment · High Court

Through: Mr. Sabarish Subramaniam, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus STATE &ANR Respondents Through: Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP for the State Mr. Rakesh Bhugra, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person. + CRL.M.C. 2582/2010 SAMINA ARSHI Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Bhugra, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus STATE & ANR Respondents Through: Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP for the State Mr. Sabarish Subramaniam, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI ORDER

26.11.2010 CrI.M.C.2217/2010 is filed by the petitioner/husband under %

Section 482 of the Cr.PC praying inter alia for quashing of the complaint case No. 184/2009 filed by respondent No.2/wife against the petitioner/husband in the Court of ACMM-I, Dwarka under Section 200 CRL.M.C.2217/2010 & CRL.M.C. 2582/2010 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. 1 of the Cr.P.C. The petitioner/husband has also sought quashing of FIR No.188/2009 lodged by respondent No.2/wlfe against him Sections 49SA/323/505 IPG, registered with Poiice Station; Dwarka, New Delhi.

Similarly, CrI.M.C. 2582/2010 is filed by the petitioner/wife under Section 482 of the Cr.PC praying inter alia for setting aside the order dated 09.06.2010 passed by the learned ASJ, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi, in Criminal Revision No.05/2010, by which the revision petition filed by respondent No.2/husband seeking quashing of the order dated 10.12.2009 passed by the learned MM on an application filed by the petitioner/wife under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, was allowed. 3_ Pursuant to the parties appearing before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre, a Settlement Agreement dated 28.10.2010 has been placed on the record. The Settlement Agreement records that neither of the parties shall make any claim against each other and that the wife shall withdraw the cases filed by her against respondent No.2/husband as mentioned in para 7 of the Settlement Agreement. Similarly, the husband has also agreed to withdraw the petition for restitution of conjugal rights filed by him against wife. It is further stated that 'Khula' has been asked for by the CRL.M.C. 2217/2010 & CRL.M.C. 2582/2010 wife and has been given by their respondent No.2/husband. Both the parties have thus agreed to severe the relationship with each other.

Both the parties are present in Court. They confirm that they have arrived at a settlement of their own free will and volition and without any undue influence or coercion from any quarters and that have signed the Settlement Agreement at page 5.

Learned APP for the State submits that the matter is at the stage of investigation. However, in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, he has no objection to the prayer made in the 1 ^ present petition being allowed.

The petitions are disposed of. Files be consigned to the record room. NOVEMBER 26, 2010/rkb CRL.M.C. 2217/2010 & CRL.M.C. 2582/2010 MIMA KOHLI,J