Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The petition is disposed of in terms of the conciliated agreement dated
Provisions considered
Judgment
ARB.P. 80/2025 Page 1 of 2$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 80/2025 SUDHA CHADHA .....Petitioner Through:Mr. Anubhav Ray, Adv. (through vc) versus SHARMISHTHA CHOUDHRY .....Respondent Through: Ms. Ruchira Gupta and Ms. Pooja Tripathi, Advs. CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAO R D E R% 29.05.20251.Learned counsel for the Respondent states that the parties have arrived at a conciliated agreement dated 26.05.2025. She states that the Respondent has already made a part payment and has handed over 17 post dated cheques. She states that the Respondent undertakes that the post-dated cheques will be duly honoured on presentation. 2.Learned counsel for the Respondent states that the terms of Clause 20 of this settlement agreement, this agreement has status and effect of an arbitral award under Section 74 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. She states that the Respondent understands that in case there is any breach of the settlement agreement, the Petitioner will be at liberty to execute this settlement agreement as an arbitral award. 3.Learned counsel for the Petitioner confirms the aforesaid submissions. 4.The petition is disposed of in terms of the conciliated agreement dated This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/06/2025 at 23:51:41 ARB.P. 80/2025 Page 2 of 226.05.2025. 5.The parties are bound down to the said agreement and the obligations assumed thereunder. 6.This petition is disposed of. MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, JMAY 29, 2025/mshClick here to check corrigendum, if any
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The petition is disposed of in terms of the conciliated agreement dated
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 74.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.