UMA SHARMA v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Bench
- JYOTI SINGH
Outcome
Disposed of
Application stands disposed of
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Petition is disposed of with liberty in accordance with law. Pending application also stands disposed of. JANUARY 10, 2025 B.S. Rohella JYOTI SINGH, J W.P.(C) 275/2025 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court…
Judgment
Through: Mr. Pushaan Singh Gullia, Advocate. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI, THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate Respondent No.1/MCD. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH %
Operative part
O R D E R 10.01.2025 CM APPL. 1338/2025 1. 2. Application stands disposed of. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 275/2025 and CM APPL. 1337/2025 3. This writ petition has been preferred on behalf of the Petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:
A. Issue appropriate writ(s), order(s), or direction(s) in the nature of a writ of mandamus thereby directing the respondent no. 1 to 3 to immediately take appropriate steps in accordance with the law i.e. Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 to stop the illegal and unauthorised construction being carried out by the respondent no. 4, to prevent further unauthorised construction by the respondent no. 4, to further direct the demolition of the said property in question i.e. property bearing 4th Floor of property 182 to 186, Gali Rui Wali, Teilwara, Sadar Bazar, Delhi - 110006 in the interest of justice;
W.P.(C) 275/2025 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 12:42:38
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No.1/MCD, on advance copy of the writ petition, submits that after the complaint dated
22.10.2024 was received from the Petitioner, the property was inspected and no fresh construction was found and only some renovation had been done in the form of laying of tiles on the floor. He further points out that even in this writ petition, there is no averment of any fresh construction, save and except, apprehension of construction in view of cement bags lying near the subject property.
At this stage, learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to take recourse to legal remedies in case there is any fresh cause of action.
Petition is disposed of with liberty in accordance with law. Pending application also stands disposed of. JANUARY 10, 2025 B.S. Rohella JYOTI SINGH, J W.P.(C) 275/2025 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 12:42:38
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Application stands disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.