RAJINDER KUMAR GUPTA v. SUSHILA DEVI (DECEASED) THROUGH LR
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Petition stands disposed of in aforesaid terms
Provisions considered
- Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 s. 14(1)(e)
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Petition is, accordingly, disposed of with the direction that after the disposal of review petition by the learned Controller, if revision is, eventually filed, it would be permissible for the petitioner herein to raise all the contentions which are being raised before this Court…
Judgment
.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Sr.Advocate with Mr. Jaideep Singh, Mr. Aman Dhyani, Ms. Kanchan Samwal, Mr. Rakshit Anand, Mr. Rudhraksh Gautam, Mr. Lalit Jhangra, advocates with petitioner in person. versus SUSHILA DEVI (DECEASED) THROUGH LR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Arvind K Gupta with Mr. Abhiesumat Gupta and Mr. Arun Bhattacharya and Mr. Ishan parashar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral)
There is already an eviction order against the petitioner herein on the ground of bonafide requirement under Section 14(1)(e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.
However, instead of challenging the abovesaid order by filing any revision petition, petitioner filed a review application before the learned Controller and while the abovesaid review application was pending, he moved an application under Section 151 CPC to highlight certain subsequent events. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:02.08.2025 12:58:37 CM(M) 4116/2024 1
Dismissal of such application is under challenge. Fact, however, remains that the review application is still pending adjudication and, therefore, this Court does not deem it appropriate to interfere with the matter at such intermediate stage of the case.
Operative part
Petition is, accordingly, disposed of with the direction that after the disposal of review petition by the learned Controller, if revision is, eventually filed, it would be permissible for the petitioner herein to raise all the contentions which are being raised before this Court while impugning order dated 27.07.2024 and 16.10.2024. 6. 7. 8. Petition stands disposed of in aforesaid terms. All rights and contentions of the parties are left open. Learned Rent Controller is, reportedly, awaiting for the outcome of the present petition and the matter is fixed before the learned Controller on
21.08.2025. 9. The liberty is, however, granted to the parties to raise fresh oral arguments before the learned Controller with respect to the abovesaid review application only. Since the eviction is sought on the ground of the bonafide requirement, this Court expects that the learned Controller would dispose of the abovesaid review application, as expeditiously as possible. JULY 31, 2025/sw/JS (MANOJ JAIN) JUDGE Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:02.08.2025 12:58:37 CM(M) 4116/2024 2
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition stands disposed of in aforesaid terms
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 — s. 14(1)(e); Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Delhi High Court, on 31 Jul 2025. The bench was MANOJ JAIN.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.