Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the present Appeal stands dismissed
Provisions considered
- Family Courts Act, 1984 s. 19
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. The present Appeal, along with pending application(s), shall stand disposed of in the aforesaid terms. ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. NOVEMBER 14, 2025/rk/va
Judgment
Cause title
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 402/2025 & CM APPL. 71191/2025 (exp) SH. NARESH KUMAR .....Appellant Through:
Mr. Sumit Kumar Khatri, Advocate
versus
SMT. ARCHANA & ANR. .....Respondents Through:
Nemo
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR
O R D E R
% 14.11.2025
The present Appeal has been filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, seeking to set aside the Impugned Order dated 28.08.2025, passed by learned Principal Judge (Family Court), Tis Hazari Courts, District North, Delhi in MT. No. 411/2018. By way of the Impugned Order, the monthly maintenance awarded to the Respondents was modified and increased.
The learned Court of Metropolitan Magistrate, Tiz Hazari, Delhi, vide its Order dated 16.05.2011, had awarded monthly maintenance of an amount of Rs. 3000/- to the wife and Rs. 2000/- to the daughter. The said amounts stood increased to Rs. 5000/- each by way of the Impugned Order passed by the learned Family Court.
Operative part
Since the Respondents are living in Faridabad, which is in the National Capital Region [“NCR”], and being a commercial city, the cost of living in the NCR is very high, the amount awarded by the learned Family Court is bare minimum. Hence, we find no ground to This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/11/2025 at 12:41:50 interfere with the Impugned Order. Accordingly, the present Appeal stands dismissed.
The present Appeal, along with pending application(s), shall stand disposed of in the aforesaid terms. ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. NOVEMBER 14, 2025/rk/va
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the present Appeal stands dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Family Courts Act, 1984 — s. 19.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.