Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ANIL KSHETARPAL, HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR
Outcome
Disposed of
The present Appeal is disposed of with liberty to the Appellant to file an application before the learned Family Court in this regard, if not already filed and the said application shall be considered by the learned Family Court in accordance with law
Provisions considered
- Family Courts Act, 1984 s. 19
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. The present Appeal is disposed of with liberty to the Appellant to file an application before the learned Family Court in this regard, if not already filed and the said application shall be considered by the learned Family Court in accordance with law. Pending…
Judgment
Cause title
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 398/2025, CM APPL. 70373/2025 (stay), CM APPL. 70374/2025 (Exp.), CM APPL. 70375/2025 (Exp.), CM APPL. 70376/2025 (to call TCR) & CM APPL. 70377/2025 (delay of 111 days in filing the Appeal) NISHA MALIK .....Appellant Through:
Mr. Bhumit Solanki and Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Advocates.
versus
JITENDRA KUMAR KUHAR .....Respondent Through:
Nemo.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR
O R D E R
% 12.11.2025
The present Appeal, filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, seeks setting aside of the Impugned Order dated 09.06.2025 passed by learned Judge, Family Court, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi, in G.P. No.31/2024 titled as “Nisha Malik v. Jitendra Kumar Kuhar”.
By the Impugned Order, the learned Family Court has made an interim arrangement whereby, the Appellant-Mother has been granted opportunity to meet her child, who is 10 years old, every alternate Saturday. The said Order has been passed with the purpose to give more time to the child to do other things of his choice, as he was busy every Saturday meeting the Appellant. Thus, the meeting frequency This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/11/2025 at 12:37:56 was modified to that extent.
Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that the Appellant being the mother should at least be granted an opportunity to interact with the child through video conferencing.
This Court has considered the submissions.
Operative part
The present Appeal is disposed of with liberty to the Appellant to file an application before the learned Family Court in this regard, if not already filed and the said application shall be considered by the learned Family Court in accordance with law. Pending applications also stand disposed of. ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. NOVEMBER 12, 2025/rk/rou
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The present Appeal is disposed of with liberty to the Appellant to file an application before the learned Family Court in this regard, if not already filed and the said application shall be considered by the learned Family Court in accordance with law
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Family Courts Act, 1984 — s. 19.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.