NEW DELHI + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 381/2025 & CM APPL. 66983/2025 (Exp.) ANKIT TRIPATHI & Anr. v. Nupur Tiwari” along with affidavit
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ANIL KSHETARPAL, HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR
Provisions considered
- Family Courts Act, 1984 s. 19
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. The present Appeal, along with pending application(s), if any, stands dismissed in the aforesaid terms. ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. OCTOBER 29, 2025/nd/va
Judgment
Cause title
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 381/2025 & CM APPL. 66983/2025 (Exp.) ANKIT TRIPATHI .....Appellant Through:
Mr. Ashok Tobria,
Mr. S. Yadav and Mr. Mayank Yadav, Advocates.
versus
NUPUR TIWARI & ANR. .....Respondents Through:
Mr. Samama Suhail, Advocate for Respondent No. 1.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR
O R D E R
% 29.10.2025
The present Appeal has been filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, against the impugned order dated 24.09.2025 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, East District, Karkardooma Courts, New Delhi in petition bearing GP No. 74/2023 titled as “Ankit Tripathi vs Nupur Tiwari” along with affidavit.
The learned Family Court has permitted the Respondent No.1 to apply for the issuance of the passport of the minor child. While addressing the grievance of the Appellant, the learned Family Court has directed the Respondent No.1 to give 20 days prior notice to the Court before taking the child abroad.
Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that consultation with the Appellant is necessary before a passport is issued to the child.
This Court has considered the submissions and finds no merit This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/11/2025 at 11:49:17 therein, as the child is in the care and custody of the Respondent No.1, who is the natural guardian of the child. She is entitled to apply for issuance of the passport of the minor child.
The concerns of the Appellant have already been safeguarded by the direction issued to the Respondent No.1 to intimate the Court at least 20 days prior to the date of foreign travel of the minor child. Hence, there is no ground for interference.
The present Appeal, along with pending application(s), if any, stands dismissed in the aforesaid terms. ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. OCTOBER 29, 2025/nd/va
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.