Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, Writ Petition along with pending Applications is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 s. 528
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 323, 336, 341, 427
- Arms Act, 1959 s. 25
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Accordingly, Writ Petition along with pending Applications is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. NOVEMBER 11, 2025/R
Judgment
Cause title
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 3571/2024, CRL.M.A. 21709/2025 BRIJESH CHAUHAN AND ORS .....Petitioners Through:
Mr. Karan Singh, Advocate.
versus
STATE THROUGH SHO PS UTTAM NAGAR AND ANR .....Respondents Through:
Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel with SI Johny Kumar & ASI Basuki, PS: Uttam Nagar.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R
% 11.11.2025
Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (8BNSS9) has been filed for quashing of FIR No.0489/2023 under Sections 323/341/ 427/336/34 IPC, registered at PS: Uttam Nagar, Delhi.
Learned Standing Counsel for State submits that on verification, it has been found that Licence of Petitioner No.1 Brijesh Chauhan has not been found correct and Section 25 of Arms Act is to be added in the Chargesheet, which has be filed in the Court.
In view of aforesaid, learned counsel for the Petitioners seeks permission to withdraw present Writ Petitions with liberty to pursue the matter before the learned Trial Court.
Operative part
Accordingly, Writ Petition along with pending Applications is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. NOVEMBER 11, 2025/R
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, Writ Petition along with pending Applications is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 528; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 323, 336, 341, 427; Arms Act, 1959 — s. 25.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.