Delhi High Court · 2011
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
The petition is hereby dismissed in default as well as non prosecution
Judgment
INDIABULLS FINANCIAL SERVICES & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Prakash Sharma, Mr. Vikas Tiwari, Advocates CORAM: JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA ORDER % (cid:9) 07.01.2011 None has turned up for the petitioner despite pass over. The petition is hereby dismissed in default as well as non prosecution. The interim order, therefore, stands vacated. Let petitioner be arrest1 and lodged in jail. JANUARY 07, 2011 SHIV NARAY DHINGRA,J Signature Not Verified Signing Date:22.08.2024 16:47:00 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. $-48 * (cid:9)IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + (cid:9)CRL.REV.P. 237/2010 RADHEY SHYAM GARG (cid:9) Petitioner Through: M r. Mridula Agarwal and Mr. R.K. Gaur, Advocates versus INDIABULLS FINANCIAL SERVICES & ANR Respondent Through 40, (cid:9) CORAM: JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA ORDER % (cid:9) 27.01.2011 Cr1. M A 966/2011 & CrI.M(B) 11612011 Issue notice of the applications to the respondents, returnable for 14th February 2011. The State, in the meantime, is directed to execute the order passed by this Court of arresting the petitioner and lodging him in jail. However, in case the entire amount, as directed by trial Court, is paid within one w om today to the complainant and proof of payment is filed, the petitioner berrested. 4na I Dasti. JANUARY 27, 2011 (cid:9) (cid:9) SHIV NARAYAN /
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The petition is hereby dismissed in default as well as non prosecution
Which court decided this case, and when?
Delhi High Court, on 14 Feb 2011. The bench was SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.