RAJIVJAIN v. PetitionerThrough
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFDELHIATNEWDELHI+W.P.(C)15029/2025RAJIVJAIN.....PetitionerThrough:versusUNIONOFINDIA&ANR......RespondentsThrough: AdvAkashVajpai, CGSCandAdvHarshBajpaiMr.SantoshKumarRoutstandingcounselforR2/SBICORAM:HON'BLEMR.JUSTICEJASMEETSINGHORDER%20.01.2026CMAPPL.3864/20261.ThisisanapplicationfiledunderSection151ofCPC,1908seekingtowithdrawthepetitionwithlibertytofileafreshonthesamecauseofaction.
Forthereasonsstatedintheapplication, issuenotice.
Mr.Raut, learnedcounselacceptsnoticeonbehalfoftherespondentsandhasnoobjectiontotheapplicationbeingallowed. Intheviewoftheaforesaid, theapplicationisallowedandthemainpetition,i.e.W.P.(C)15029/2025,isdismissedaswithdrawnwithlibertytofileafreshpetitionasperlaw.
Thenextdateofhearingi.e.06.02.2026,standscancelled.JASMEETSINGH,JJANUARY20,2026/DM
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.