✦ Delhi High Court

BSESRAJDHANI YAMUNA POWER LTD v. UOI THRU M/O LABOUR

ANU MALHOTRA

Case at a glance

Judgment

Through: Mr.Sandeep Prabhakar and Mr.Vikas Mehta, Advocates versus UOI THRU M/O LABOUR ..... Respondent Through: None for R-1. Mr.K.P. Mavi and Mr.B.P. Mishra, Advocates for R-2 and 3. Ms.Jaskaran Kaur, Adv for R-4. None for R-5. CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA

O R D E R 16.08.2017 % CM Nos. 9167/2017 and 9168/2017 The matter is taken up today as 14th August, 2017 was declared a Court holiday. The learned counsel for the respondent No.4 submits that the matter has been transferred to the Union of India in relation to the aspect submitted through CM no.9167/2017 filed on behalf of the respondents No.2 and 3 seeking direction to respondent No.4 to file the petitioner’s application seeking exemption from the applicability of the provisions of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 dated

3.12.2002 stating that the said application has not been decided since the date of the order dated 1.3.2006 in W.P (C) No.3013/2005. Notice of the said application be issued to the respondent No.1 through standing counsel to submit the present status on the said application. Renotify on 25th September, 2017. AUGUST 16, 2017/sv ANU MALHOTRA, J

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Delhi High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments