✦ Delhi High Court · 05 Dec 2025

M/S UGRO CAPITAL LIMITED & Anr. v. M/S MOBILE PLUS & Ors.

AURAV, PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV2 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

The instant petition stand disposed of

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. Accordingly, Mr. Jatin Lalwani (Mobile No.942592987, e-mail id: [email protected]) is appointed as the Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the inter se disputes between the parties.
  • Para 99. The instant petition stand disposed of. DECEMBER 5, 2025/p/mj PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J Signature Not Verified Signed By:PRIYA Signing Date:15.12.2025 18:17:30 Signature Not Verified Signed By:PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

Judgment

Through: Mr. Balraj Gautam, Adv. versus M/S MOBILE PLUS & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Eshna Kumar and Mr. Vikrant Ballav Sharan, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV JUDGEMENT PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act), seeking appointment of an Arbitrator, to adjudicate upon the disputes that have arisen between the parties.

2.

The parties have admitted that an arbitration clause exists in the agreement between the parties and have also mutually consented to the appointment of an arbitrator.

3.

A dispute has arisen with respect to the Facility Agreement dated

28.07.2023. A business loan advance to the respondent has not been repaid. Clause 19.15 of the Agreement clearly provides for the resolution of Signature Not Verified Signed By:PRIYA Signing Date:15.12.2025 18:17:30 Signature Not Verified Signed By:PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV disputes by way of arbitration, which is extracted as under:

19.15. ARBITRATION All the claims, disputes, differences or questions of any nature arising between the Parties, whether during or after the termination of this Agreement, in relation to the construction, meaning or interpretation of any term used or clause of this Agreement or as to the rights, duties, liabilities of the parties arising out of this Agreement, shall be resolved through a sole Arbitrator to be appointed by the Lenders, arbitration proceeding shall be conducted as per the provisions of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as may be amended from time to time. The arbitration proceedings shall be conducted preferably through online means or otherwise through conventional means in English language. The arbitral award shall be final and binding on the Parties. The seat and venue of arbitration shall be as per the discretion of the Lenders ( for both conventional as well as online mode).

4.

Accordingly, Mr. Jatin Lalwani (Mobile No.942592987, e-mail id: [email protected]) is appointed as the Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the inter se disputes between the parties.

5.

The arbitration would take place under the aegis of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DIAC) and in terms of its rules and regulations. The Sole Arbitrator shall be entitled to fees as per the Schedule of Fees maintained by the DIAC.

6.

The Sole Arbitrator is also requested to file the requisite disclosure under Section 12 (2) of the Act within a week of entering on reference.

7.

All rights and contentions of the parties in relation to the claims/counter-claims are kept open, to be decided by the Sole Arbitrator on their merits, in accordance with law.

8.

Needless to say, nothing in this order shall be construed as an expression of opinion of this Court on the merits of the controversy between the parties. Let a copy of the instant order be sent to the Sole Arbitrator through electronic mode as well. Signature Not Verified Signed By:PRIYA Signing Date:15.12.2025 18:17:30 Signature Not Verified Signed By:PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

Operative part

9.

The instant petition stand disposed of. DECEMBER 5, 2025/p/mj PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J Signature Not Verified Signed By:PRIYA Signing Date:15.12.2025 18:17:30 Signature Not Verified Signed By:PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The instant petition stand disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 11.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Delhi High Court, on 05 Dec 2025. The bench was AURAV, PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Delhi High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments