SHRI MAHINDER SINGH v. SMT. JASWANT KAUR (DECEASED) & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Bench
- AKR, REKHA PALLI, SAURABH BANERJEE
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 96; O. XII r. 6
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. The appeal, along with the accompanying applications, is accordingly disposed of as not pressed with liberty to the appellant to file a Review Petition before the learned Single Judge. We further direct that if a Review Petition is filed by the appellant within one…
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA(OS) 50/2024, CM APPL. 57691/2024-Delay 55 days, CM APPL. 57692/2024-Stay, CM APPL. 57693/2024-Delay 25 days in re-filing SHRI MAHINDER SINGH .....Appellant Through: Mr. P.P. Singh Bhati, Mr. Akashdeep and Ms. Neha Bhati, Pandey Advocates. versus SMT. JASWANT KAUR (DECEASED) AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Pawanjit Bindra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vivek Sharma, Ms. Purnima and Mr. Vikas Sharma, Advocates. Mr. Kuljeet Singh, Advocate for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
O R D E R 20.02.2025 The present appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) read with Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Rules, seeks to assail the judgment and decree dated 14.05.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in CS (OS) No. 1201/2012. Vide the impugned judgment, the learned Single Judge has allowed the application under Order XII Rule 6 of CPC filed by the respondents/ defendant nos.3 to 6 and consequently dismissed the suit for partition, possession and permanent injunction preferred by the appellant/ plaintiff.
After some arguments, learned counsel for the appellant submits that since there is a factual error in the impugned order in recording of the stand taken by Sh. Kuljeet Singh, which he contends has been incorrectly recorded by the learned Single Judge, the appellant instead of pressing the present This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/02/2025 at 13:54:12 appeal at this stage, will approach the learned Single Judge by way of a Review Petition.
The appeal, along with the accompanying applications, is accordingly disposed of as not pressed with liberty to the appellant to file a Review Petition before the learned Single Judge. We further direct that if a Review Petition is filed by the appellant within one week from today, the same will be considered by the learned Single Judge on merits and not rejected on the ground of delay.
Needless to state, in case the appellant is still aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Single Judge, it will be open for the appellant to approach this Court on all grounds permissible under law, including but not limited to the grounds raised in the present appeal.
Needless to state, this Court has not expressed any opinion on the rival submissions of the parties. FEBRUARY 20, 2025/akr REKHA PALLI, J SAURABH BANERJEE, J This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/02/2025 at 13:54:12
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.