MOHDASAD v. MUNICIPALCORPORATIONOFDELHI
Judgment
&68*INTHEHIGHCOURTOFDELHIATNEWDELHI+W.P.(C)13904/2025MOHDASAD.....PetitionerThrough: None.versusMUNICIPALCORPORATIONOFDELHI......RespondentThrough: Ms.NamrataMukim, SCforMCD,MsNiharikaSingh. Adv. (M:9899106515)68AND+W.P.(C)14221/2025DANISHAHMED.....PetitionerThrough: None.versusMUNICIPALCORPORATIONOFDELHI......RespondentThrough: Ms.NamrataMukim, SCforMCD,MsNiharikaSingh. Adv.CORAM:JUSTICEPRATHIBAM.SINGHJUSTICEMADHUJAINORDER%09.03.20261.Thishearinghasbeendonethroughhybridmode.
NoneappearsforthePetitioners.
Asthesemattersarelistedinthetypedsupplementarylist, noadverseordersarebeingpassedagainstthePetitioners. Letthesemattersbelistedagainforcompliance.
LetCourtnoticebeissuedtoMr.SandeepKumarOjha, ld. CounselforthePetitionersbytheRegistry. Acopyoftoday’sorderbecommunicatedto This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/03/2026 at 13:50:33 Mr.SandeepKumarOjha, ld. CounselbytheRegistry.
LettheMunicipalCorporationofDelhialsoservethestreetvendorsthroughconcernedSHO.
Ifthecostsarenotdepositedasdirectedpreviously, actionwouldbeliabletobetakenagainstthePetitioners. Liston13thApril,2026.PRATHIBAM.SINGH,J.MADHUJAIN,J.MARCH9,2026/dk/ck
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.