HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 1535/2024 RISHIKESH SHARMA v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & Anr.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 1535/2024 RISHIKESH SHARMA .....Petitioner Through:
Mr. Ankur Chhibber,
Mr. Yogesh Kumar Malwa and Mr. Harkesh Parashar, Advocates.
versus
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through:
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
O R D E R
% 22.09.2025
This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 60089/2025 (Restoration)
The present application under Section 151 of the CPC seeks the following prayers:
i) Revive the proceedings of Contempt Petition No. 1535 /2024 in view of the liberty granted to the petitioner to revive the Contempt Petition in case of continued infraction or any residual issue vide order dated 13.08.2025, in the interest of justice. Any other and further order which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed.
Learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner submits that vide order dated 13.08.2025 passed by this Court, liberty was given to the petitioner to revive the present petition subject to the orders passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court. It is further pointed out that vide order dated 04.09.2025, the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/09/2025 at 12:23:07 SLP bearing no. 13026/2025 has been dismissed.
Issue notice.
On the petitioner/applicant taking necessary steps, issue notice to the respondent through all permissible modes, including electronic mail, as well as through counsel, returnable on 28.11.2025. AMIT SHARMA, J SEPTEMBER 22, 2025/bsr
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.