Delhi High Court · 2025

$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 6081/2025 & CRL.M.A. 25874/2025 IMRAN SAIFI AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Harish Chand Sharma and Ms. Poonam B. Sharma, Advs. along with the petitioners in person. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for State with Ms. Garima and Mr. Ashish Priya, Advs. along with SI Arvind Verma. Mohd. Zahid, Mr. Brahm Kumar Pandey and Mohd. Dilshad, Advs. for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL O R D E R % 04.09.2025 1. The instant petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter “BNSS”) [earlier Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter “CrPC”)] has been filed on behalf of the petitioners praying for the quashing of FIR no. 414/2022, registered at Police Station Gokul Puri, for offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/506/34/377/323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter “IPC”) along with Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. 2. The brief facts concerning the present dispute are that the marriage between petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 was solemnized on 21.12.2020, according to Muslim rites and ceremonies. However, due to This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/09/2025 at 12:07:48 some temperamental differences between them, shortly after their marriage, they started living separately. No child was born from the said wedlock. 3. Despite efforts of reconciliation, both the parties could not settle their differences, pursuant to which respondent no. 2 got FIR no. 414/2022 registered. 4. However, at this stage, with the intervention of family members and relatives, both the parties have entered a settlement on 28.10.2024. The terms and conditions of the said settlement is annexed as Annexure P-12 to the petition. In pursuance of the said settlement, the parties have jointly agreed that they shall move for divorce under Section 13B (1) and under Section 13B (2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter “HMA”) and accordingly, a divorce decree dated 10.12.2024 was passed by the Court concerned. 5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that respondent no. 2 has settled all her claims in respect of her dowry articles, meher amount, iddat expenses, jewelleries, gift items and claims of past, present and future maintenance and permanent alimony with the petitioners and all disputes of any nature whatsoever for a sum of ₹7,00,000/-. 6. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the remaining sum of ₹2,00,000/- has been paid in a connected matter bearing Crl.M.C. no. 6251/2025 before the Court of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amit Mahajan, and therefore the pending amount stands received by respondent no. 2 in the present case. 7. It is, thus, prayed that the instant FIR be quashed on the basis of Settlement Deed dated 10.12.2024. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/09/2025 at 12:07:48

8. Learned APP for the State, who appears on advance notice, accepts notice and submits that there is no opposition to the prayer made on behalf of the petitioners seeking quashing of the FIR in question in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties. 9. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 10. The petitioners are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsel and the Investigating Officer, Police Station Gokul Puri. Respondent no. 2 is also present in the Court and has been identified by her counsel and the concerned Investigating Officer. 11. The instant criminal proceedings concern non-compoundable offences that are private in nature and do not have a serious impact on society, especially considering that there is a settlement/compromise between the victim and the accused. 12. In such cases, it is settled law that High Court is also required to consider the conduct and antecedents of the accused in order to ascertain that the settlement has been entered into by her own free will and has not been imposed upon her by the petitioners or any person related to them. 13. In the case of State of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan and Ors., (2019) 5 SCC 688, the Hon’ble Supreme Court held that the powers conferred under Section 482 of the CrPC/Section 528 of the BNSS, can be exercised by the Courts to quash criminal proceedings featuring non-compoundable offences, when the matter arises out of matrimonial or family disputes. Moreover, it is pertinent to satisfy the Court that the said non-compoundable offences are private in nature and do not have a serious impact on society. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/09/2025 at 12:07:48

14. Furthermore, it was observed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Ramgopal and Ors. v. The State of Madhya Pradesh, 2021 INSC 568, that the extraordinary power enjoined upon the High Courts under Section 482 of the CrPC/Section 528 of the BNSS can be invoked even when such a case falls within the ambit of non-compoundable offences, given that the Court is satisfied that the nature of the offence does not impact the conscience of society, and that the compromise between the parties is voluntary and amicable. 15. In the present case, the complainant/respondent no. 2 is present in Court and has categorically stated that she has entered into compromise and settled the entirety of disputes with the petitioners amicably and of her own free will, without any pressure or coercion. There is also no allegation from respondent no. 2 that the conduct and antecedents of petitioners have been bad towards her after entering into this compromise. As per the Settlement Deed, respondent no. 2 has received the entire settled amount. Further, she submits that she has no objection to the present FIR being quashed. 16. Therefore, in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties and the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the present petition is allowed. Accordingly, FIR no. 414/2022, registered at Police Station Gokul Puri, for offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/506/34/377/323, and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom stand quashed. 17. The petition, along-with pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. AJAY DIGPAUL, J SEPTEMBER 4, 2025Sk/yr