✦ High Court of India · 31 Oct 2025

Ms. Vishwa Bharti, Adv v. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Case Details High Court of India · 31 Oct 2025

ARB.P. 960/2025 Page 1 of 6 $~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 960/2025 TARA CHAND SUMIT CONSTRUCTION CO. .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Vishwa Bharti, Adv. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Vashishtha, Mr. Nishant Nain, Advocates Ms. Saumya Tandon, CGSC , Mr. Gaurav Singh Sengar,Adv for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD O R D E R % 31.10.2025 1. The present petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed by the Petitioner seeking appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes which have arisen between the parties. 2. Material on record indicates that a contract was awarded to the Petitioner by the Respondent on 06.05.2022 for the purpose of restoration of main carriageway of MP Road No.216 & 201 cut by DTL for laying 220 Kv underground cable from metro corridor to Sanchar Vihar Apartment along with Sector-12 & 4 at Dwarka (deposit work). 3. It is the case of the Petitioner that disputes arose between the parties regarding the completion of the work and the contract has been determined by the Respondent/ DDA on 10.02.2023. 4. It is stated that the Respondent/ DDA appointed one Mr. K K Gupta as a Sole Arbitrator. However, since the Petitioner objected to the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/11/2025 at 12:20:35 ARB.P. 960/2025 Page 2 of 6 appointment of Mr. K K Gupta as the Sole Arbitrator, he did not proceed with the matter and therefore the Petitioner has approached this Court for appointment of an Arbitrator in terms of Clause 25 of the contract. 5. Notice was issued by this Court on 14.07.2025. Clause 25 of the agreement which contains the clause for settlement of disputes and arbitration, reads as under:- “CLAUSE 25 Settlement of Disputes & Arbitration Except where otherwise provided in the contract, all questions and disputes relating to the meaning of the specifications, design, drawings and instructions here-in before mentioned and as to the quality of workmanship or materials used on the work or as to any other question, claim, right, matter or thing whatsoever in any way arising out of or relating to the contract, designs, drawings, specifications, estimates, instructions, orders or these conditions or otherwise concerning the works or the execution or failure to requirement of reference by the appointing authority, execute the same whether arising during the progress of the work or after the cancellation, termination, completion or abandonment thereof shall be dealt with as mentioned hereinafter: i) If the contractor considers any work demanded of him to be outside the requirements of the contract, or disputes any drawings, record or decision given in writing by the Engineer-in-Charge or if the Engineer in Charge considers any act or decision of the contractor on any matter in connection with or arising out of the contract or carrying out of the work, to be unacceptable and is disputed, such party shall promptly within 15 days of the arising of the disputes request the EM or where there is no who shall refer the disputes to Dispute Redressal Committee (DRC) within 15 days along with a list of disputes with amounts claimed if any in respect of each such dispute. The This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/11/2025 at 12:20:35 ARB.P. 960/2025 Page 3 of 6 Dispute Redressal Committee (DRC) shall give the opposing party two weeks for a written response, and, give its decision within a period of 60 days extendable by 30 days by consent of both the parties from the receipt of reference from EM. The constitution of Dispute Redressal Committee (DRC) shall be as indicated in Schedule „F‟. Provided that no party shall be represented before the Dispute Redressal Committee by an advocate/legal counsel etc. If the Dispute Redressal Committee (DRC) fails to give its decision within the aforesaid period or any party is dissatisfied with the decision of Dispute Redressal Committee (DRC) or expiry of time limit given above, then either party may within a period of 30 days from the receipt of the decision of Dispute Redressal Committee (DRC), give notice to the EM/DDA, in charge of the work or for appointment of arbitrator on prescribed proforma as per APPENDIX XV under intimation to the other party. It is a term of contract that each party invoking arbitration must exhaust the aforesaid mechanism of settlement of claims/ disputes prior to arbitration. The EM/DDA shall in such case appoint the sole arbitrator or one of the three arbitrators as the case may be within 30 days of receipt of such a request and refer such disputes to arbitration. Wherever the Arbitral Tribunal consists of three Arbitrators, the contractor shall appoint one arbitrator within 30 days of making request for arbitration or of receipt of request by Engineer-incharge to EM/DDA for appointment of arbitrator, as the case may be, and two appointed arbitrators shall appoint the third arbitrator who shall act as the Presiding Arbitrator. In the event of a. A party fails to appoint the second Arbitrator, or This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/11/2025 at 12:20:35 ARB.P. 960/2025 Page 4 of 6 b. The two appointed Arbitrators fail to appoint the Presiding Arbitrator, then EM shall appoint the second or Presiding Arbitrator as the case may be. ii) Disputes or difference shall be referred for adjudication through arbitration by a Tribunal having sole arbitrator where Tendered amount is Rs. 100 Crore or less. Where Tendered Value is more than Rs. 100 Crore, Tribunal shall consist of three Arbitrators as above. The requirements of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (26 of 1996) and any further statutory modifications or reenactment thereof and the rules made there under and for the time being in force shall be applicable. It is a term of this contract that the party invoking arbitration shall give a list of disputes with amounts claimed, if any, in respect of each such dispute along with the notice for appointment of arbitrator and giving reference to the decision of the DRC. It is also a term of this contract that any member of the Arbitration Tribunal shall be a Graduate Engineer with experience in handling public works engineering contracts at a level not lower than Chief Engineer (Joint Secretary level of Government of India). This shall be treated as a mandatory qualification to be appointed as arbitrator. Parties, before or at the time of appointment of Arbitral Tribunal may agree in writing for fast track arbitration as per the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (26 of 1996) as amended in 2015. Subject to provision in the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (26 of 1996) as amended in 2015 whereby the counter claims if any can be directly filed before the arbitrator without any requirement of reference by the appointing authority, the arbitrator shall adjudicate on only such disputes as are referred to him by the appointing authority and give separate award against each dispute and claim referred to him and in all cases where the total amount of the claims by any party This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/11/2025 at 12:20:35 ARB.P. 960/2025 Page 5 of 6 exceeds Rs. 1,00,000/-, the arbitrator shall give reasons for the award. It is also a term of the contract that if any fees are payable to the arbitrator, these shall be paid as per the Act. The place of arbitration shall be as mentioned in Schedule F. In case there is no mention of place of arbitration, the arbitral tribunal shall determine the place of arbitration. The venue of the arbitration shall be such place as may be fixed by the Arbitral Tribunal in consultation with both the parties. Failing any such agreement, then the Arbitral Tribunal shall decide the venue. (A) The Decision of the Superintending Engineer regarding the quantum of reduction as well as justification thereof in respect of rates for substandard work which may be decided to be accepted will be final and could not be open to Arbitration. (B) Where the arbitral award is for the payment of money no interest shall be payable on whole or any part of the money for any period till the date on which This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/11/2025 at 12:20:35 ARB.P. 960/2025 Page 6 of 6 the award is made.” 6. Learned Counsel for the Respondent/DDA, on instructions, states that the Respondent/DDA has no objection for appointment of an arbitrator. 7. Accordingly, Mr. Bhakti Vardhan Singh, Advocate, (Mob. No. 9818249711) is appointed as a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes between the parties. 8. The arbitration would take place under the aegis of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DIAC) and would abide by its rules and regulations. The learned Arbitrator shall be entitled to fees as per the Schedule of Fees maintained by the DIAC. 9. The learned Arbitrator is also requested to file the requisite disclosure under Section 12(2) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 within a week of entering into reference. 10. All rights and contentions of the parties in relation to the claims/counter-claims are kept open, to be decided by the learned Arbitrator on their merits, in accordance with law. 11. Needless to say, nothing in this order shall be construed as an expression of this Court on the merits of the contentions of the parties. 12. The petition is disposed of along with pending application(s), if any. SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J OCTOBER 31, 2025 hsk

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments