SUSHMADHAWAN v. NARESHKUMARKHANNA.....DefendantsThrough & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFDELHIATNEWDELHI+CS(OS)604/2021SUSHMADHAWAN.....PlaintiffThrough: Ms.RuchiJain, Mr.S.K.GandhiandMr.harshNanwal, Advocates.versusNARESHKUMARKHANNA&ORS......DefendantsThrough: Mr.NamitSuriandMs.TanyaSharma, AdvocatesforD2,D3(a)toD3(c)CORAM:HON'BLEMR.JUSTICEVIKASMAHAJANORDER%28.04.2026I.A.11857/2026(JointapplicationbythepartiesunderOrderXXIIIRule3CPC)
Thepresentsuitwasfiledbytheplaintiffprayingforpartition, declaration, renditionofaccounts, permanentandmandatoryinjunctionwithrespecttothepropertybearingno.C4F/181,Janakpuri,B-1,NewDelhi–110058measuring80Sq.Yds. (hereinafterreferredtoas‘suitproperty’).Thepropertywasownedbythepredecessor-in-interestofthepartiestothesuitnamely, Sh.Chamanlal.
Itisstatedintheapplicationthatduringpendencyofthesuit, thepartieshavearrivedatmutualsettlement/understanding, termswhereofhavebeenincorporatedinthepresentapplication, particularlyinPara3to6thereof.
Thepresentapplicationhasbeensignedbytheplaintiffaswellasbythedefendants. Theapplicationissupportedbytheaffidavitsofallthe This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/05/2026 at 12:01:03 parties.
Havinggonethroughthetermsofthesettlement, this Courtfindsthesametobelawful. Therefore, thereisnoimpedimentindecreeingthesuitintermsofthecompromise.
Accordingly, thesuitisdecreedintermsofthesettlement, thedetailsofwhichhavebeengivenintheapplicationitself. Theapplicationshallformpartofthedecreeandthepartiesshallremainboundbythetermsofthesettlement.
Theapplicationaswellasthesuitstandsdisposedofintheaboveterms.
Thenextdatefixed,i.e.,17.09.2026standscancelled.VIKASMAHAJAN,JAPRIL28,2026/jg
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.