IN TI{E HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI v. GOVT. OFNCT & Ors.
Judgment
Through Mr. Anand Yadav, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BIIAT Vo ORDER 25.09.2007 r '+ Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the contempt proceedings in this case being the dismissal of the petitioner's appeal in LPA No.73212002 as well as the dismissal of the review petition, of the Gaon Sabha being Review Petition No.28712004 is pending on the file of this court. Contempt Case No. 65712004 is scheduled for hearing on 8.I0.200i. Mr. yadav further submitted that the respondents No.4 and 5 have no objection if the petitioners move an application for appropriate orders in the said contempt proceedings. In view of the above statement learned counsel for the petitioners seeks liberty to withdraw this contempt petition and approach in Contempt Case No.657/2004 with appropriate application for directions in accordadce with law. D The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn but in the above terms. The interim orders are hereby vacated. SEPTEMBER25,2007 Signature Not Verified Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. s. RAVIIIDRA BHATJ * t7 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI w.P.(c) 4L65|2OO7 VED PRAKASH & ORS. ... Petitioners Through Mr. R.Dagar, Advocate versus GOW. OF NCT & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Anand Yadav, Advocate for R-4 & S/applicants in CM No. 1-4596107. Mr. Amit K. Paul, Advocate for MCD. Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani, Advocate for R-l- & 2. CORAM: /. . t o/o" Y 'FroN'BLEt VIR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR o*-' DER 23.LL.2OO7 CM No. L4596/20O7 This is an application filed by the Respondents 4 and S'for \. modification of order dated 25th September, 2007 . Learned counsel for the non-applicants state that they have no objection if the application may be allowed. Accordingly, this \. -\ 4\ application is allowed as prayed for. Necessary correction be carried out in the order dated 25th ,L- Septemb er, 2007 . 'G' Application stands disposed of. NOVEMBER 23,2OO7 \6Y/"' MURALID S. HAR, J.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.