Delhi High Court · 2010
Judgment
Through : Mr. Sumit Bansal and Mr.Manish Paliwal, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. … … … … … RESPONDENTS - V E R S U S - Through : Mr.Ajay Verma, Ms.Renuka Arora and Ms.Sangeeta Chandra, Advocates for the DDA. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Advocate for Land & Building Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and LG of Delhi. Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate for LAC. Ms.Rachna Shrivastava, Advocate for Govt. of NCT of Delhi. Mr.Atul Mr.B.V.Niren, Nanda, Ms.Rameeza Hakeem, Mr.Gaurav Gupta, Mr.Sumeer Sodhi, Ms.Malika Gahlot, Ms.Sugandha and Mr.Sanjay Bhardwaj, Advocates for UOI. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL
Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
To be referred to Reporter or not?
Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J. For orders, see WP(C) No.1692/2006. No No No SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J. MARCH 26, 2010 VEENA BIRBAL, J.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.