Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Ms. Sneha Jain, Adv. for the Plaintiff. Ms. Bijal Trivedi, Adv. for the Defendant. + I.A. No. 12742/2011 fu/O 23 R 3 r/w Sec. 151 CPCl in CSfOSl No. 527/2011 * Parties have arrived at an out of Court settlement. Terms of settlement have been recorded in paras 2 (a) to (j) of the application, which is marked as Mark C-1. The application has not only been signed by the parties but also supported by their respective affidavits. I have perused the application and find the compromise to be lawful. Accordingly, a compromise decree is passed in terms of mark C-1 which shall form part of the Decree. Decree sheet be drawn. In terms of the compromise, counsel for the defendants has handed over demand draft of ?1.5 lakh, a photocopy whereof has been placed on record, to the counsel for the plaintiffs towards satisfaction of Clause 2(d). Since parties have arrived at an out of court settlement, let 50% of the Court fee be refunded to the plaintiffs, in accordance with law. All interim orders stand vacated and pending applications are disposed of as infructuous. August 12, 2011 t:K. PATHAK, J.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.