✦ High Court of India · 27 Oct 2025

Mr. Rahul Malhotra and Ms. Sneha Agarwal, Advs v. STATE ORS

Case Details High Court of India · 27 Oct 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
27 Oct 2025
Length
1,340 words

Acts & Sections

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV JUDGEMENT PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. (ORAL) The present petition is filed under Section 278 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, seeking the grant of Letters of Administration (hereinafter referred to as „LoA‟ ) with respect to the two registered Wills dated 08.02.2016 and 28.06.2018 (hereinafter referred to as „the wills‟) executed by Late Sardar Lakhbir Singh @ Sardar Lakhbir Singh Sahni (hereinafter referred to as „the testator‟). 2. The testator was residing at House No. 32/52, Road No. 52, Punjabi Bagh (West), New Delhi-110026, and left for his heavenly abode on

31.01.2025. The testator is survived by his wife, four daughters, and one son. Signature Not Verified Signed By:AMIT KUMAR SHARMA Signing Date:01.11.2025 12:30:54 Signature Not Verified Signed By:PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

3. The petitioner, being the son of the testator and the sole beneficiary under both the Wills, seeks LoA in accordance with the Wills. Respondent No. 2 is the wife, and Respondent Nos. 3 to 6 are the daughters of the testator. It is also stated that at the time of execution of the Will dated

08.02.2016, Respondent Nos. 3 to 6 executed undertakings declaring no objection to the said Will and agreeing not to make any claims in respect of the testator’s properties. 4. The testator left behind movable and immovable properties as detailed in Schedules A and B to the petition. The movable assets include mutual funds amounting to Rs. 20,33,556/- and balances in bank accounts totalling Rs. 10,62,574.89/-, while the immovable assets comprise of properties at Punjabi Bagh (West) and Karol Bagh in New Delhi, commercial units at M3M Urbana Business Park in Gurugram, and an industrial plot at Bahadurgarh, Haryana. The total value of the movable estate is stated to be Rs. 32,29,330.89/-, and the immovable assets are approximately Rs. 20,94,79,105/-, with no outstanding liabilities. The Schedules of properties are reproduced as under:- SCHEDULE A LIST OF ASSETS OF TESTATOR S. NO. DETAILS OF ASSETS

1. Property in Government Securities transferrable at public debt office. 2. Amounts lying in bank accounts - i. Axis Bank- 915010014131284 in sum of Rs.726,974.61. ii. Axis Bank- 922010020132022 in sum of Rs.2,80,350.49 iii. Axis Bank- 920010017972521 in Signature Not Verified Signed By:AMIT KUMAR SHARMA Signing Date:01.11.2025 12:30:54 VALUE NA Rs. 10,62,574.89/- Signature Not Verified Signed By:PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV sum of Rs.(-)213.98 iv. Axis Bank- 918010004305111 in sum ol'Rs.3140.23 v. indusind bank- 159811160881 in sum of Rs.1997.99 vi. Kotak Bank- 610010102454 in sum of Rs.(-)215.55 vii. HDFC Bank- 50100699619899 in sum of Rs.50,110/- Immovable properties –

3. a. Properly No. 32152, Punjabi Bagh West, New Delhi-l10026 in sum of Rs.15,94,74,205/- Rs.20,94,79,105/-. b. Unit bearing No. UBP/ST/O/12L/6A, UBP/ST/O/12L/6D, UBP/ST/O/12L/6E, UBP/ST/O/12L/6F, UBP/ST/O/12L/6G, in M3M Urbana UBP/ST/O/12L/6H Business Park, Sector-67, Gurugram, Haryana, Rs.2,09,50,400/- India c. Share of the deccasecl in Unit No. 101, 102, 103, 104, each measuring 1382.49 sq. ft., total aggregating to 5229.96 sq. ft. forming part of the property bearing Municipal No.10409 (16-A/8), built on Plot No.8 in Block 16A, situated in Western Extension Area, Karol Bagh, New Delhi in sum of Rs.1,83,10,000/-. d. Industrial Plot No.1677, Sector MIE, Bahadurgarh measuring 275.50 sq. Signature Not Verified Signed By:AMIT KUMAR SHARMA Signing Date:01.11.2025 12:30:54 Signature Not Verified Signed By:PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

4. mtrs. in sum of Rs.,1,07,44,500/-. Shares in public companies, securities, bonds, etc. (a) 48% shareholding in M/s Asian Ceramios Pvt. Ltd. sum of Rs.1,33,200/-(b) Mutual Funds in sum o[ Rs.20,33,556/- Stock in trade

5. 6. Other properties not forming part of above heads. Total Rs.21,66,756/- NA NA Rs.21,07,58,354.89 S.NO. 1.

2. 3. 4. 5. SCHEDULE B LIST OF LIABILITIES OF TESTATOR Details of the liabilities Amount of debt due and payable by the Deceased Amount of funeral expenses Amount of mortgage/encumbrances Property held in trust Other liabilities Total Value NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL

5. Respondent Nos. 2 to 6 have no objection to the relief sought in the instant petition. Their statements to that effect were taken on record on

21.05.2025, and they were directed to file affidavits within four weeks. Pursuant thereto, the no objection affidavits have been filed by the respondents. 6. The petitioner has also published the citation in newspapers i.e., 'Punjab Kesari' (Hindi) and 'The Statesman' (English) on 12.06.2025. 7. Subsequently, vide 22.09.2025, the Joint Registrar recorded the statements of PW-1 Mr. Anmol Singh Sahni, PW-2 Mrs. Hardeep Kaur Chadha, and PW-3 Mr. Suresh Kumar. Signature Not Verified Signed By:AMIT KUMAR SHARMA Signing Date:01.11.2025 12:30:54 Signature Not Verified Signed By:PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

8. Moreover, the Tehsildar, Punjabi Bagh, has also placed on record the valuation report of the Punjabi Bagh property. 9. At this stage, it is pertinent to note herein that this Court in the case of Sh. Raj Rani Bhasin vs. State1, has held that the person to whom LoA is granted does not thereby become entitled to the property or estate of the deceased/testator and the estate still succeeds according to the law of succession applicable to the deceased/testator. The primary objective of a LoA, issued by the Court, is to authorize the appointed administrator to gather and consolidate the assets of the deceased or testator. It also allows the administrator to interact with relevant authorities where such assets are held or recorded, enabling the realization of those assets and facilitating their transfer to the rightful successors in accordance with the applicable laws of succession. It was further held that the administrator is required to, from time-to-time, to file accounts in the Court with respect to the administration of the estate and/ or as to how the estate has been settled/ transferred to the successors in accordance with the law of succession applicable to the deceased and upon the administrator defaulting in the same, the Court retains the power to revoke the grant. For the sake of clarity, Paragraph no.9 of the aforesaid decision reads as under: “9. The person to whom letters of administration are granted does not thereby become entitled to the property or estate of the deceased. The estate still succeeds according to the law of succession application to the deceased. The purpose of Letters of Administration is merely to enable the administrator so appointed by the Court to collect/ assimilate the properties of the deceased, and/ or to deal with the various authorities with whom the properties of the deceased may be vested or recorded and to realize the same and / or to have the same 1 158(200) DLT 713 Signature Not Verified Signed By:AMIT KUMAR SHARMA Signing Date:01.11.2025 12:30:54 Signature Not Verified Signed By:PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV transferred in the names of the successors in accordance with law of succession applicable to the deceased. The administrator is required to, from time-to-time, file accounts in the Court with respect to the administration of the estate and/ or as to how the estate has been settled/ transferred to the successors in accordance with law of succession application to the deceased and upon the administrator defaulting in the same, the Court retains the power to revoke the grant.”

10. Under the aforesaid circumstances, there is no impediment in directing for issuance of LoA in accordance to the Wills. Besides, if the valuation qua any of the immovable property is not received, let the issuance of LoA be subject to the same. 11. In view of the aforesaid, the Court directs for issuance of LoA subject to statutory compliances before the concerned Registrar. Let the petitioner also make the payment of the necessary stamp duty. 12. The requirement of surety bond stands exempted as there is no objection to the Wills. 13. List before the concerned Joint Registrar on 12.11.2025 for compliance. OCTOBER 27, 2025/p/mj PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J Signature Not Verified Signed By:AMIT KUMAR SHARMA Signing Date:01.11.2025 12:30:54 Signature Not Verified Signed By:PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments