✦ High Court of India · 22 Aug 2025

Chaudhary, Mr. Mohit Rastogi and Mr. Altaf, Advocates with v. THE STATE

Case Details High Court of India · 22 Aug 2025

$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3560/2025 RAHUL DEWAN & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dhanda, Mr. Mehraj Chaudhary, Mr. Mohit Rastogi and Mr. Altaf, Advocates with Petitioners in person versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for the State with SI Chetan P.S. Paschim Vihar, R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA O R D E R % 22.08.2025 1. Petition under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed on behalf of the Petitioners seeking quashing of FIR No. 0194/2024 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at P.S. Paschim Vihar and all the proceedings emanating therefrom, in terms of Memorandum of Understanding dated 24.07.2024. 2. Issue Notice. 3. Learned APP for the State appearing on advance Notice, accepts Notice on behalf of the State. 4. Brief facts of the case are that the marriage between Petitioner/husband and the Respondent No. 2/wife was solemnized on 11.12.2005, according to the Hindu rites and ceremonies and one child, This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/08/2025 at 11:53:25 namely, Master Daksh Dewan aged about 17 years was born out of the said wedlock, who are at present under the care and custody of Petitioner/husband. Due to temperamental issues, the Petitioner/husband and the Respondent No. 2 are residing separately since June, 2022. 5. It is further submitted that on 24.02.2024, on the basis of complaint made by the Respondent No. 2, an FIR No. 0194/2024 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC got registered at P.S. Paschim Vihar. 6. The parties are present before this Court in-person today and have been identified by their respective Counsel. 7. It is submitted that the FIR was a consequence of the matrimonial disputes between the Complainant and the Petitioner/husband. It is stated that the Petitioners and the Respondent No. 2 have amicably settled all the disputes and differences between them and arrived at Memorandum of Understanding dated 24.07.2024. 8. In the Settlement, it was inter alia settled between the parties that the Respondent No. 2/wife and the Petitioner/husband shall dissolve their marriage by decree of mutual consent under Section 13-B(1) and 13-B(2) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, from the Court of learned Principal Family Judge, Delhi. It is stated that the Petitioner/husband shall pay a sum of Rs.11,00,000/- towards full and final settlement of all the claims in all respect i.e. towards past, present and future maintenance, balance istridhan and alimony of the Respondent No. 2/wife. 9. It is stated that the Petitioner/husband shall pay first instalment of Rs.3,00,000/- to Respondent No.2/wife at the time of recording of statements of both the parties before the Court under Section 13-B (1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955; the second instalment of Rs.3,00,000/- shall be This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/08/2025 at 11:53:25 paid at the time of signing of NOC within one month from the date of first motion for the transfer of property situated in Noida; third instalment of Rs.5,00,000/- shall be paid to the Respondent No. 2 at the time of recording of statements of both the parties befor the Court under Section 13-B (2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. It is also submitted that the parties shall withdraw all the proceedings pending against each-other. 10. It is stated that out of the settled amount, the Petitioner/husband has already paid the entire settled amount of Rs.11,00,000/- to the Respondent No. 2, which is acknowledged by the Respondent No. 2. 11. It is also stated that on 28.10.2024, the marriage between the Petitioner/husband and the Respondent No. 2/wife, had been dissolved by mutual consent, as per the Hindu law. 12. In view of the Memorandum of Understanding dated 24.07.2024, the present Petition has been filed. 13. The parties have endorsed the amicable Settlement and accepted the terms thereof voluntarily and have undertaken to remain bound by the terms of the Settlement. The parties have reaffirmed the terms of the Memorandum of Understanding dated 24.07.2024 and they submit that the said Settlement has been arrived at between the parties, without any pressure and coercion. 14. The Respondent No. 2/wife, who is present in the Court submits that she has received all amounts due to her and has no objection if the FIR is quashed. 15. In view of the above facts that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will and without any coercion and also the fact that the present matter is a family matter, no useful purpose will be This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/08/2025 at 11:53:25 served in continuing with the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. Hence, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. 16. Moreover, there is no legal impediment in quashing the aforesaid FIR in question. 17. Accordingly, FIR No. 0194/2024 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at P.S. PaschimVihar and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. It is hereby clarified that the said Settlement is without any prejudice to the rights and entitlements of the children, in accordance with law. 18. The Petition alongwith pending Applications, if any, is disposed of accordingly. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J AUGUST 22, 2025 N

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments