RANJIT KUMAR RAY v. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH MINISTRY
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Border Security Force Act, 1968 s. 117(2)
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of taking the said statement on record. Signature Not Verified W.P.(C) 6827/2025 Digitally Signed By:AJIT KUMAR Signing Date:23.05.2025 19:04:53
Judgment
Through: Ms. Nisha Dhaka, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA THROUGH MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS & ORS. ....Respondents Through: Mr Abhishek Yadav, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL % JUDGMENT (ORAL)
20.05.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
The prayer of the petitioner is that statutory appeal preferred by him under Section 117 (2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 be decided by the respondents.
Mr. Abhishek Yadav, learned counsel for the respondents, on instructions, submits that the appeal would be decided within a period of four weeks.
The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of taking the said statement on record. Signature Not Verified W.P.(C) 6827/2025 Digitally Signed By:AJIT KUMAR Signing Date:23.05.2025 19:04:53
Needless to say, the decision as and when taken would be communicated to the petitioner forthwith. C. HARI SHANKAR, J. AJAY DIGPAUL, J. MAY 20, 2025/yg Click here to check corrigendum, if any Signature Not Verified W.P.(C) 6827/2025 Digitally Signed By:AJIT KUMAR Signing Date:23.05.2025 19:04:53
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.