✦ Delhi High Court · 08 May 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025

MANOJ JAIN

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

Petition stands disposed of in aforesaid terms

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. Though, the Constitutional Courts, generally, do not pass any order directing the learned Trial Court to dispose of matter or, for that matter, any application in a time-bound manner, unless, of course, there is a case of acute hardship or exigency, keeping in mind…

Judgment

Through: Ms. Harshita Aggarwal, Advocate. .....Petitioner versus NEETU BIRLA Through: None. .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral)

2.

Petitioner filed a suit for recovery in the year 2019. The limited request in the present petition is to the effect that the learned Trial Court may be requested to consider the application moved by the respondent/defendant under Order VII Rule 11 CPC as well as three applications filed by petitioner/plaintiff, expeditiously.

3.

It is submitted that these applications are pending consideration for quite some time.

Operative part

4.

Though, the Constitutional Courts, generally, do not pass any order directing the learned Trial Court to dispose of matter or, for that matter, any application in a time-bound manner, unless, of course, there is a case of acute hardship or exigency, keeping in mind the overall facts and also appreciating the fact that the abovesaid applications are pending for quite some time, the Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:09.05.2025 12:01:56 CM(M) 865/2025 1 present petition is disposed of with request to the learned Trial Court to make best endeavor to dispose of all such pending applications, as expeditiously as possible and, preferably, within a period of four months from the date it takes up the abovesaid suit for further consideration. Needless to say, the concerned parties shall extend their cooperation and assistance in this regard. 5. 6. Petition stands disposed of in aforesaid terms. Pending applications also stands disposed of in aforesaid terms. MAY 8, 2025/sw/SS (MANOJ JAIN) JUDGE Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:09.05.2025 12:01:56 CM(M) 865/2025 2

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition stands disposed of in aforesaid terms

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. VII r. 11.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Delhi High Court, on 08 May 2025. The bench was MANOJ JAIN.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Delhi High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments