Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFDELHIATNEWDELHI+W.P.(C)5186/2019RAVIKUMARDOGRA.....PetitionerThrough: Mr.ManoranjanMishra, Adv.versusMAHANAGARTELEPHONENIGAMLTD.ANDORS......RespondentsThrough: Mr.JagdishChandra, CGSCandMr.SujeetKumar, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLEMR.JUSTICENAVINCHAWLAHON'BLEMS.JUSTICEMADHUJAINORDER%17.10.2025REVIEWPET.529/20251.TheReviewPetitionunderSection114readwithOrderXLVIIRule1oftheCodeofCivilProcedure,1908(in short,‘CPC’),hasbeenfiledbytheReviewPetitioners/respondentnos.1and2,seekingareviewoftheJudgmentdated16.09.2025passedbythisCourtintheaboveWritPetition.
Thegroundurgedbythereviewpetitioners/respondentsisthattheWritPetitionerallegedlyconcealedfromthisCourtthefactthatcognizanceinFIRNo.369/2015,registeredatPoliceStationK.N.KatjuMarg, Delhi, whichresultedinCriminalCaseNo.12906/2022,hadbeentakenbythelearnedMetropolitanMagistrateon07.03.2023.
WefailtoappreciatehowthisfactcouldhaveanybearingonourJudgment. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/10/2025 at 12:21:37
Thereviewpetitionis, accordingly, dismissed.NAVINCHAWLA,JMADHUJAIN,JOCTOBER17,2025/b/RM/DG
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.