COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 245/2019 MS. SHAZIA REHMAN v. MR. ANWAR ELAHI & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
Accordingly, this application is allowed and disposed of impleading legal heirs of deceased Defendant No
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 O. XXIII r. 3
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Amended memo of parties is taken on record. I.A. 12235/2025 5. This is an application filed on behalf of the parties under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC to record the settlement between the parties and disposal of the suit in…
Judgment
Cause title
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/05/2025 at 13:04:16 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 245/2019 MS. SHAZIA REHMAN .....Plaintiff Through:
Mr. Vipul Ganda and Ms. Avnika Mishra, Advocates.
versus
MR. ANWAR ELAHI & ORS. .....Defendants Through:
Mr. Aditya Singh and Mr. Prateek Bhardwaj, Advocates for D-1 and D-2.
Ms. Gurkamal Hora Arora and Mr. Kushal Gupta, Advocates for D-3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
O R D E R
% 14.05.2025 I.A. 47758/2024 1. This application is filed on behalf of Defendant No. 1 for impleadment of legal heirs of Defendant No. 3.
Learned counsels for the non-applicants have no objection to the application being allowed.
Operative part
Accordingly, this application is allowed and disposed of impleading legal heirs of deceased Defendant No. 3 as mentioned in paragraph 7 of the application as Defendants No.3(a), 3(b), 3(c) and 3(d)(i), (d)(ii) and (d)(iii).
Amended memo of parties is taken on record. I.A. 12235/2025 5. This is an application filed on behalf of the parties under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC to record the settlement between the parties and disposal of the suit in terms thereof. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/05/2025 at 13:04:16 6. Present suit was filed by the Plaintiff inter alia for declaration, permanent and mandatory injunction in respect of 4556 shares of Defendant No. 2 company allegedly transferred by Defendant No.1 in his favour. During the pendency of the suit, Defendant No.3 expired on 07.08.2024 due to old age and ill health and Defendant No.1 filed an application to implead his legal heirs. In the meantime, Plaintiff, Defendant No.1 and legal heirs of deceased Defendant No.3 and Defendant No.2 amicably resolved their inter se disputes and Memorandum of Settlement was executed and signed between them on 02.02.2025, copy of which has been placed on record. 7. Court has perused the terms of settlement and finds the same to be lawful. 8. Accordingly, this application is allowed and disposed of recording the settlement between the parties. CS(COMM) 245/2019 9. Suit is decreed in terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 02.02.2025, which shall form part of the decree and terms whereof shall bind the parties to the Agreement. 10. Registry is directed to draw up the decree sheet. 11. Suit is disposed of. 12. Date of 19.05.2025 stands cancelled. JYOTI SINGH, J MAY 14, 2025/shivam
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this application is allowed and disposed of impleading legal heirs of deceased Defendant No
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. XXIII r. 3.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.