Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- PRATEEK
Outcome
Withdrawn
The petition, alongwith the pending application, is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as aforesaid
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In view of the above, Mr. Shekhar Dasi, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this petition, with liberty to This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning…
- Para 44. The petition, along with the pending application, is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as aforesaid.
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4819/2025 & CM APPL. 22121/2025 SHAMA KHANAM ASRAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shekhar Dasi, Md. Talha, Mr. Ayush Dassi and Mr. Deepesh Kasana, Advocates. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Abhinav Singh and Ms. Kanishka Agarwal, Advocates. CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANO R D E R% 16.04.20251.The petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, for a direction upon the respondent–Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi [“GNCTD”] to demarcate the property [1 Bigha of land falling in Khasra No.540 to 545/461/3 min, Village Jasola, Mehrauli, Delhi], which he claims to have purchased by way of a registered Sale Deed dated 20.01.1988.
Learned counsel for GNCTD, who appears on advance notice, states upon instructions, that the land has already been urbanised, and jurisdiction for the purpose of demarcation and mutation, both lie with Delhi Development Authority [“DDA”].
In view of the above, Mr. Shekhar Dasi, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this petition, with liberty to This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 23:25:18 approach DDA by way of a representation.
Operative part
The petition, along with the pending application, is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as aforesaid.
All rights and contentions of the parties on merits remain reserved. PRATEEK JALAN, JAPRIL 16, 2025 SS/AD/
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The petition, alongwith the pending application, is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as aforesaid
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.