✦ Delhi High Court · 15 Apr 2025

SPARSH DHIR v. ESHA DHIR & Anr.

MANOJ JAIN2 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

deeper into the matter, the present petition is disposed of with direction to the

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 77. The present petition, along with pending applications, stands disposed of in aforesaid terms.

Judgment

.....Petitioner Through: Ms. Amita Gupta, Mr. Anshu Misra, Mr. Aayush Gupta, Advocates. versus ESHA DHIR & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yakesh Anand, Ms. Deepshikha Sansanwal and Mr. Akshay Thakur, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral)

2.

The point involved in the present petition is very short and precise. On account of the alleged conduct of the petitioner, who had filed a petition seeking divorce, his right to file income affidavit and to address arguments on application moved under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 by his wife has been closed.

3.

Learned counsel for respondents appears on advance notice and submits that, though, the conduct of the petitioner has been that of total non-cooperation and his endeavour is to delay the proceedings on one pretext or the other, at the same time, in order to ensure that there is no further delay in disposal of application in question, he would have no objection if one last and final opportunity is granted to the petitioner herein to do the needful in a Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:16.04.2025 18:06:17 CM(M) 678/2025 1 time-bound manner. He also submits that there is previous unpaid cost of Rs.30,000/- as well.

Operative part

4.

Keeping in mind the overall facts of the case and without going any deeper into the matter, the present petition is disposed of with direction to the petitioner herein to file his income affidavit before the learned Trial Court within three working days from today with advance copy learned counsel for respondents or respondents.

5.

The unpaid cost of Rs.30,000/- and, additional cost of Rs.10,000/- which is being imposed today i.e. total cost of Rs.40,000/-, be also transmitted to the account of the respondent through online banking mode within one week from today.

6.

In case, the income affidavit is filed within three days and cost is cleared within seven days from today, the learned Trial Court shall be permitted to consider such income affidavit filed by the petitioner herein and would also hear him in respect to the application moved under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

7.

The present petition, along with pending applications, stands disposed of in aforesaid terms.

8.

Order dasti, under the signatures of Court Master. APRIL 15, 2025/ss/SS (MANOJ JAIN) JUDGE Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:16.04.2025 18:06:17 CM(M) 678/2025 2

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: deeper into the matter, the present petition is disposed of with direction to the

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — s. 24.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Delhi High Court, on 15 Apr 2025. The bench was MANOJ JAIN.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Delhi High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments