DELHI + W.P.(C) 6234/2026 and CM APPL. 34088/2026 SHARDA T T COLLEGE v. NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Set aside
In light of the aforesaid decisions and the facts of the present cases, the impugned refusal orders are set aside
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 77. The present petitions, along with the pending applications, are disposed of in the above terms. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J MAY 20, 2026 na
Judgment
Cause title
and 56 * IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6234/2026 and CM APPL. 34088/2026 SHARDA T T COLLEGE .....Petitioner Through:
Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Sr. Adv with
Mr. Mayank Manish,
Mr. Ravi Kant, Mr.Vineet Upadhyay, and Mr. Ayush Aanand, Advocates.
versus
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR .....Respondent Through:
Mr.Anuj Kapoor, Mr.Shivom Sethi, and Mr.Nandeesh Nanda, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 6176/2026 and CM APPL. 30355/2026 MAHALA TEACHERS TRAINING INSTITUTE .....Petitioner Through:
Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Sr. Adv with
Mr. Mayank Manish,
Mr. Ravi Kant, Mr.Vineet Upadhyay, and Mr. Ayush Aanand, Advocates.
versus
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR .....Respondent Through:
Mr.Anuj Kapoor, Mr.Shivom Sethi, and Mr.Nandeesh Nanda, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
O R D E R
% 20.05.2026 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/05/2026 at 13:39:20
The present petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India are directed against the refusal orders dated 06.03.2026 in W.P.(C) 6234/2026 and 07.04.2026 in W.P.(C) 6176/2026.
The matter was heard atlength on 19.05.2026, however, Mr.Kapoor, learned counsel for the respondents, sought time to take instructions in light of the decision of the Supreme Court in Maa Vaishno Devi Mahila Mahavidyalaya Vs. State of U.P.1, thedecision of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) 5691/2026, as well as the directions passed by the Division Bench of this Court in LPA 372/2026.
Today, learned counsel for the respondents, on instructions, submits that aninspection wouldbe carried out considering the timelines stipulated in the aforesaid decision of the Supreme Court.
Operative part
In light of the aforesaid decisions and the facts of the present cases, the impugned refusal orders are set aside. The respondents shall conduct aninspection of the petitioner collegeswithin a period of 7 days from today and shall thereafter take all appropriate necessary steps to ensure that the timelines mentioned in the aforesaid decision of the Supreme Court are scrupulously complied with.
The entire exercise, including the issuance of show cause notice(s) pointing out thedeficiencies, if any, the furnishing of the petitioners’replies, and the adjudication of thoseshow cause notices, shall be completed on or before 07.06.2026, for the academic session 2026-27.Let a copy of the inspection report also be supplied to the petitioners.
The date already fixed before the Roster Bench,i.e.25.05.2026, stands cancelled. 1(2013) 2 SCC 617 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/05/2026 at 13:39:20
The present petitions, along with the pending applications, are disposed of in the above terms. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J MAY 20, 2026 na
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In light of the aforesaid decisions and the facts of the present cases, the impugned refusal orders are set aside
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.