✦ Delhi High Court · 05 Mar 2022

APU DEBNATH v. UNION OF INDIA & Ors.

C HARI SHANKAR, AJAY DIGPAUL

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms

Key paragraphs

  • Para 66. We, accordingly, dispose of this writ petition directing the respondent to take a decision on the petitioner’s application dated 5 March 2022, one way or the other, within two weeks.
  • Para 88. The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. C. HARI SHANKAR, J. AJAY DIGPAUL, J. MARCH 24, 2025 Click here to check corrigendum, if any Signature Not Verified Signed By:MEENU KALRA Signing Date:27.03.2025 12:15:27 W.P.(C) 3588/2025

Judgment

.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhay Kumar Bhargava, Mr. Satyarth Sinha and Ms. Khushi, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Sharma, SPC with Mr. Gokul Sharma, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL % ORDER (ORAL) 24.03.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

1.

The petitioner is facing proceedings under Sections 40 and 46 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968, alleging commission, by him, of offences under Section 376 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code,

2.

During the course of the proceedings, the petitioner submitted an application to the Commandant 114 Battalion, BSF, Bagafa, South Tripura, who has passed an order for ROE1.

3.

The application sought call detail records of the complainant, on Signature Not Verified 1 Record of Evidence. Signed By:MEENU KALRA Signing Date:27.03.2025 12:15:27 W.P.(C) 3588/2025 the basis of whose complaint, the case was set up.

4.

We have heard Mr. Abhay Kumar Bhargava, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Rahul Sharma, learned Senior Panel Counsel for the respondents.

5.

Mr. Abhay Kumar Bhargava, learned Counsel for the petitioner is agreeable to disposal of this writ petition with a direction to the respondent to take a decision on the said application.

6.

We, accordingly, dispose of this writ petition directing the respondent to take a decision on the petitioner’s application dated 5 March 2022, one way or the other, within two weeks.

7.

We do not express any opinion either on the maintainability or the merits of the said application. The respondent would be at liberty to take an informed decision on the matter.

Operative part

8.

The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. C. HARI SHANKAR, J. AJAY DIGPAUL, J. MARCH 24, 2025 Click here to check corrigendum, if any Signature Not Verified Signed By:MEENU KALRA Signing Date:27.03.2025 12:15:27 W.P.(C) 3588/2025

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Border Security Force Act, 1968 — ss. 40, 46; Indian Penal Code, 1860.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Delhi High Court, on 05 Mar 2022. The bench was C HARI SHANKAR, AJAY DIGPAUL.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Delhi High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments