Mr. Rohit Tyagi, Advocate (through VC) v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

$~76 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 854/2025 SANDEEP KUMAR @ SANDEEP SISODIYA AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rohit Tyagi, Advocate (through VC). Petitioners in person. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (criminal) for the State. SI Anjli, PS Bhalswa Dairy. Mr. N.S. Sisodia and Mr. Nazim, Advocates for R-2 alongwith R-2 in person. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA O R D E R % 11.07.2025 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. CRL.M.A. 7963/2025(exemption) 2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 854/2025 3. The present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the BNSS (Section 482 of the Cr.P.C.) seeks quashing of FIR No. 70/2024, under Sections 498A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at P.S. Bhalswa Dairy and all other consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, including the chargesheet pending before the court of Ms. Preeti, learned JMFC, Rohini Courts, Delhi. 4. The marriage between petitioner no.1/husband and respondent This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/07/2025 at 12:54:35 no.2/wife was solemnized on 21.06.2021 as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. 5. No child was born out of the said wedlock. 6. Due to matrimonial differences between petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2, the parties started residing separately from 14.09.2022. Subsequently, respondent no.2/complainant registered an FIR against the petitioners. 7. On 08.05.2024, parties arrived at a settlement and as per the said settlement deed, petitioner no.1 has agreed to pay an amount of Rs. 6,00,000/- to the respondent no.2/wife towards full and final settlement of all her claims including stridhan, permanent alimony and maintenance - present, past and future. The copy of the aforesaid settlement deed dated 08.05.2024 is on record (Annexure P-2). 8. In terms of the said settlement, the marriage between the parties stands dissolved by a decree of divorce dated 23.08.2024, passed by Ms. Nivedita Anil Sharma, Principal Judge, Family Court (North), Rohini Courts, Delhi. Further, as per the settlement deed, total amount of Rs. 6,00,000/- has already been paid to respondent no.2. 9. The matter was listed before the learned Joint (Judicial) 27.05.2025, wherein it has been recorded as under:- “1. The present non contentious petition has been filed by the petitioners under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of the FIR NO. 70/2024 Under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code registered at P.S. Bhalswa Dairy on the basis of settlement arrived at between the parties. 2. As per the submissions, the matter between the petitioners and R-2 has been amicably settled. P-8 is appearing through virtual mode and vide separate submission he stated that matter has been amicably settled. 3. Vide separate statement recorded in this behalf, P-1 to 7, 9 & 10 stated that dispute between petitioners and R-2 has been amicably settled as per the settlement deed dated 08.05.2024. The settlement has been arrived at between the parties herein without any force, coercion, undue influence This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/07/2025 at 12:54:35 and pressure. They have signed the settlement deed with their wish and will. Vide separate statement recorded in this behalf, R-2 stated that dispute between R-2 and petitioners has been amicably settled as per the settlement deed dated 08.05.2024. The settlement has been arrived at between the parties herein without any force, coercion, undue influence and pressure. The settlement deed has been signed with wish and will. 4. Investigating Officer is present in Court and has duly verified the identity of both the parties. Separate statement of Investigating Officer has also been recorded. 5. The parties along with their counsels have confirmed that the settlement deed has been duly entered into between them. 6. Learned counsel for State/APP enters appearance and accepts notice. He submits that in view of the statement recorded, let the matter be placed before the Hon’ble Court. 7. The compromise/settlement deed is in writing and has been duly signed by both the parties. I have heard both the parties and from the direct dialogue with both the parties, it is observed that the consent of both the parties is found to be genuine and has not been obtained under undue influence or pressure. 8. In view of the above, matter be placed before the Hon’ble Court on 11.07.2025.” 10. Petitioners and complainant/respondent no. 2 are present before the Court and have been duly identified by their respective counsel, as well as the Investigating Officer, SI Anjli, PS Bhalswa Dairy. 11. The complainant/respondent No.2 states that the matter has been settled with the petitioners and she has no objection if the FIR is quashed. She further states that all the terms of the agreement have been complied with. 12. Learned Standing Counsel for the State submits that the investigation in the present FIR is complete and the chargesheet has been filed. 13. In Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, (2012) 10 SCC 303, the Hon’ble Supreme Court has recognized the need of amicable resolution of disputes by observing as under:- “61. ... In other words, the High Court must consider whether it would be unfair or contrary to the interest of justice to continue with the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/07/2025 at 12:54:35 criminal proceedings or continuation of criminal proceedings would tantamount to abuse of process of law despite settlement and compromise between the victim and the wrongdoer and whether to secure the ends of justice, it is appropriate that criminal case is put to an end and if the answer to the above question(s) is in the affirmative, the High Court shall be well within its jurisdiction to quash the criminal proceeding.” 14. In view of the aforesaid circumstances, and the fact that the parties have put a quietus to the dispute, no useful purpose will be served in continuing with the present FIR No. 70/2024, under Sections 498A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at P.S. Bhalswa Dairy and all other consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, including the chargesheet pending before the court of Ms. Preeti, learned JMFC, Rohini Courts, Delhi. 15. In the interest of justice, the petition is allowed, and the FIR No. 70/2024, under Sections 498A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at P.S. Bhalswa Dairy and all other consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, including the chargesheet pending before the court of Ms. Preeti, learned JMFC, Rohini Courts, Delhi, is hereby quashed. 16. Petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly. 17. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. AMIT SHARMA, J JULY 11, 2025/sn/yg