✦ Delhi High Court · 25 Feb 2026

UNION OF INDIA v. M/S RAMA CONSTRUCTIONS COMPANY

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

Therefore, the petition is dismissed in the aforesaid terms

Judgment

#18. With regards to Claim 1.1.1., it is contended by the petitioner that the process of calculation of market rate adopted by the Arbitrator was in contravention of Clause No. 12 of the CA, which stipulated a procedure to be adopted in order to determine the market prevalent rates of extra items at the time of actual execution. The Arbitrator has

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Therefore, the petition is dismissed in the aforesaid terms

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 34; Indian Contract Act, 1872 — ss. 55, 73.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Delhi High Court, on 25 Feb 2026. The bench was JASMEET SINGH.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Delhi High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments