Delhi High Court · 2025

$~70 to 83 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI (70)+ W.P.(C) 10476/2020 & CM APPL. 34085/2020, CM APPL. 26823/2021, CM APPL. 33209/2021 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Mukul Singh, CGSC with Ms. Ira Singh, Advs. Ms. Madhusmita Bora and Mr. Bijay Kumar Pradhan, Advs. versus S. S. PANDIAN AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. G. Natarajan and Mr. Akshay, Advs. (71)+ W.P.(C) 1244/2021 & CM APPL. 3471/2021, CM APPL. 3472/2021 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Madhusmita Bora and Mr. Bijay Kumar Pradhan, Advs. versus KULVINDER SINGH KANG AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. G. Natarajan and Mr. Akshay, Advs. Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Adv. (72)+ W.P.(C) 1726/2021 & CM APPL. 4981/2021, CM APPL. 10558/2021 UNION OF INDIA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Madhusmita Bora and Mr. Bijay Kumar Pradhan, Advs. versus R.K. NAGPAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. G. Natarajan and Mr. Akshay, Advs. Mr. Promod Mehta, Adv. (73)+ W.P.(C) 2187/2021 & CM APPL. 6366/2021, CM APPL. 6367/2021 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Madhusmita Bora and Mr. Bijay Kumar Pradhan, Advs. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/11/2025 at 13:05:05 versus SUNITA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. G. Natarajan and Mr. Akshay, Advs. Mr. Promod Mehta, Adv. (74)+ W.P.(C) 2302/2024 & CM APPL. 9544/2024 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Madhusmita Bora and Mr. Bijay Kumar Pradhan, Advs. versus DILIP KUMAR SINGH MAYENGBAM .....Respondent Through: Mr. G. Natarajan and Mr. Akshay, Advs. Mr. Mukesh Pandey, Mr. Pradyumn Singh, Mr. Anand Kumar Shukla, Mr. Sawan Kumar Shukla, Mr. Yash Baraliya, Advs. (75)+ W.P.(C) 2544/2021 & CM APPL. 7496/2021, CM APPL. 7497/2021 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Madhusmita Bora and Mr. Bijay Kumar Pradhan, Advs. versus KUMUD MALIK AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. G. Natarajan and Mr. Akshay, Advs. (76)+ W.P.(C) 2743/2021 & CM APPL. 8168/2021, CM APPL. 8169/2021 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Madhusmita Bora and Mr. Bijay Kumar Pradhan, Advs. versus GUNJAN BHATNAGAR AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. G. Natarajan and Mr. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/11/2025 at 13:05:05 Akshay, Advs. (77)+ W.P.(C) 146/2022 & CM APPL. 377/2022, CM APPL. 7457/2022 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Madhusmita Bora and Mr. Bijay Kumar Pradhan, Advs. versus KARUNA SHANKAR DUBEY AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. G. Natarajan and Mr. Akshay, Advs. (78)+ W.P.(C) 2088/2022 & CM APPL. 5994/2022, CM APPL. 8618/2022 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Madhusmita Bora and Mr. Bijay Kumar Pradhan, Advs. versus AUTEE GOPAL SHANKARRAO AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. G. Natarajan and Mr. Akshay, Advs. (79)+ W.P.(C) 2535/2022 & CM APPL. 7252/2022 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Madhusmita Bora and Mr. Bijay Kumar Pradhan, Advs. versus SUNIL GOPALRAO SHINKHEDE .....Respondent Through: Mr. G. Natarajan and Mr. Akshay, Advs. (80)+ W.P.(C) 2876/2022 & CM APPL. 8317/2022, CM APPL. 8681/2022 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Madhusmita Bora and Mr. Bijay Kumar Pradhan, Advs. versus AMLAN JYOTI MAZUMDAR AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. G. Natarajan and Mr. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/11/2025 at 13:05:05 Akshay, Advs. (81)+ W.P.(C) 3891/2022 & CM APPL. 11574/2022 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Madhusmita Bora and Mr. Bijay Kumar Pradhan, Advs. versus DR. RAJYASHREE BANERJEE AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. G. Natarajan and Mr. Akshay, Advs. (82)+ W.P.(C) 13550/2022 & CM APPL. 41295/2022, CM APPL. 41296/2022 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Madhusmita Bora and Mr. Bijay Kumar Pradhan, Advs. versus MOHAN SINGH .....Respondent Through: Mr. G. Natarajan and Mr. Akshay, Advs. (83)+ W.P.(C) 8002/2023 & CM APPL. 30777/2023 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Madhusmita Bora and Mr. Bijay Kumar Pradhan, Advs. versus KAKARAPARTY SATYANARAYANA MURTY AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. G. Natarajan and Mr. Akshay, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN % 12.11.2025 O R D E R 1. These petitions have been filed by the petitioners, challenging the Orders passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Tribunal’), whereby the learned Tribunal, placing reliance on the order passed by This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/11/2025 at 13:05:05 the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, in O.A. No. 1067/2017, titled Tarsem Nath Kaushal & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors., disposed of the Original Applications filed by the respondents herein, with a further direction that the retiral dues already released to the respondents shall be subject to adjudication by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, wherein a challenge against the said order is pending. 2. We are informed that the challenge to the aforesaid order of the Chandigarh Bench of the learned Tribunal has been dismissed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana vide its Judgment titled The Director General, All India Radio & Ors. v. Tarsem Nath Kaushal & Ors., 2025:PHHC:060491-DB. 3. Though the learned counsel for the petitioners sought to distinguish the said Judgment and re-argue the matter. We find no reason to differ with the findings of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana. 4. The petitions, along with the pending applications, are accordingly dismissed. 5. There shall be no orders as to costs. NAVIN CHAWLA, J MADHU JAIN, J NOVEMBER 12, 2025/ys/k/DG