Dr.S.S. Hooda, Ms.Rashmi Rawat, Ad v. BORDER SECURITY FORCE
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Binding the respondent to the above statement, the present petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Border Security Act, 1968 s. 117(2)
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Binding the respondent to the above statement, the present petition is disposed of.
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2225/2025 ROHIT .....Petitioner Through: Dr.S.S. Hooda, Ms.Rashmi Rawat, Advs. versus BORDER SECURITY FORCE .....Respondent Through: Mr.Puneet Yadav, SPC, Mr.Chitvan Singhal, GP, CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAURO R D E R% 20.02.20251.The petitioner has approached this Court by way of the present petition, seeking the limited relief that his Statutory Petition under Section 117(2) of the Border Security Act, 1968 against the order dated 12.04.2024 convicting him with punishment of dismissal from service, be decided by the Competent Authority expeditiously.
The petitioner contends that the Statutory Petition was filed way back on 17.10.2024, and has not been decided as yet.
Issue notice.
Notice is accepted by Mr.Puneet Yadav, the learned counsel for the respondent.
He assures this Court that the Statutory Petition shall be decided within a period of eight weeks from today and the order thereon shall be communicated to the petitioner within the same period. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 19:55:03
Operative part
Binding the respondent to the above statement, the present petition is disposed of.
We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the claim of the petitioner. We also make it clear that it shall be open to the petitioner, if aggrieved of the decision on the Statutory Petition, to challenge the same in accordance with the law. NAVIN CHAWLA, J SHALINDER KAUR, JFEBRUARY 20, 2025/Arya/IKClick here to check corrigendum, if any
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Binding the respondent to the above statement, the present petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Border Security Act, 1968 — s. 117(2).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.